...
首页> 外文期刊>The New England journal of medicine >Regulatory review of novel therapeutics - Comparison of three regulatory agencies
【24h】

Regulatory review of novel therapeutics - Comparison of three regulatory agencies

机译:新疗法的监管审查-三个监管机构的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The upcoming reauthorization of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act focuses on improving the review process for new drug applications at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). METHODS:Using publicly available information from the FDA, the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and Health Canada, we compared the time for completion of the first review and the total review time for all applications involving novel therapeutic agents approved by the three regulatory agencies from 2001 through 2010 and determined the geographic area in which each novel therapeutic agent was first approved for use. RESULTS:There were 510 applications for novel therapeutic agents approved from 2001 through 2010 - 225 by the FDA, 186 by the EMA, and 99 by Health Canada; among the applications, there were 289 unique agents. The median length of time for completion of the first review was 303 days (interquartile range, 185 to 372) for applications approved by the FDA, 366 days (interquartile range, 310 to 445) for those approved by the EMA, and 352 days (interquartile range, 255 to 420) for those approved by Health Canada (P<0.001 for the comparison across the three agencies). The median total review time was also shorter at the FDA than at the EMA or Health Canada (P = 0.002). Among the 289 unique novel therapeutic agents, 190 were approved in both the United States and Europe (either by the EMA or through the mutual recognition process), of which 121 (63.7%) were first approved in the United States; similarly, 154 were approved in both the United States and Canada, of which 132 (85.7%) were first approved in the United States. CONCLUSIONS:For novel therapeutic agents approved between 2001 and 2010, the FDA reviewed applications involving novel therapeutics more quickly, on average, than did the EMA or Health Canada, and the vast majority of these new therapeutic agents were first approved for use in the United States. (Funded by the Pew Charitable Trusts.).
机译:背景:即将对《处方药使用者费用法》进行重新授权的重点是改善食品和药物管理局(FDA)对新药申请的审查程序。方法:利用FDA,欧洲药品管理局(EMA)和加拿大卫生部的公开信息,我们比较了由三个监管机构批准的涉及新型治疗药物的所有申请的首次审查时间和总审查时间从2001年到2010年,确定了每种新型治疗剂首次获准使用的地理区域。结果:2001年至2010年,共有510项新治疗剂的申请-FDA批准225项,EMA批准186项,加拿大卫生部批准99项;在这些应用程序中,有289个唯一代理。对于FDA批准的申请,完成首次审核的平均时间长度为303天(四分位数范围为185至372),由EMA批准的完成时间为366天(四分位数范围为310至445),而352天(四分位数范围(255到420)(加拿大卫生部批准的范围)(三个机构之间的比较,P <0.001)。 FDA的中位总审查时间也短于EMA或加拿大卫生部(P = 0.002)。在289种独特的新型治疗药物中,有190种在美国和欧洲(通过EMA或通过相互认可的过程)获得了批准,其中121种(占63.7%)在美国首次获得批准;同样,美国和加拿大共批准了154个,其中美国首次批准了132个(85.7%)。结论:相对于EMA或加拿大卫生部,对于2001年至2010年间批准的新型治疗剂,FDA平均更快地审查了涉及新型治疗剂的申请,并且这些新型治疗剂中的绝大多数首先获准在美国使用。状态。 (由皮尤慈善信托基金资助。)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号