首页> 外文期刊>Current cardiology reports. >Does aggressive glycemic control benefit macrovascular and microvascular disease in type 2 diabetes? Insights from ACCORD, ADVANCE, and VADT.
【24h】

Does aggressive glycemic control benefit macrovascular and microvascular disease in type 2 diabetes? Insights from ACCORD, ADVANCE, and VADT.

机译:积极的血糖控制对2型糖尿病的大血管和微血管疾病有好处吗?来自ACCORD,ADVANCE和VADT的见解。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Diabetes is increasing rapidly worldwide and frequently results in severe vascular complications. A target glycated hemoglobin of less than 7% has commonly been recommended in hopes of preventing both macrovascular and microvascular complications. Although results from trials of intensive glycemic control have generally supported the notion that lower glycated hemoglobin values reduce microvascular disease, the evidence for similar benefits for macrovascular disease has been less clear. As macrovascular disease is the major cause of morbidity and mortality in type 2 diabetes, this remains one of the more important unresolved clinical questions. Recent results from the ACCORD, ADVANCE, and VADT studies have challenged the conventional believe that lower glycated hemoglobin values should be pursued in all diabetic patients. Factors that may influence whether intensive glucose management is advisable include duration of diabetes, pre-existing macrovascular disease, hypoglycemic unawareness, and significant comorbidities. Glycated hemoglobin goals should account for these factors and be individualized for each patient.
机译:糖尿病在世界范围内迅速增长,并经常导致严重的血管并发症。通常建议目标糖化血红蛋白低于7%,以期预防大血管和微血管并发症。尽管强化血糖控制试验的结果普遍支持较低糖化血红蛋白值可减少微血管疾病的观点,但对于大血管疾病具有类似益处的证据尚不清楚。由于大血管疾病是2型糖尿病发病率和死亡率的主要原因,因此这仍然是更重要的尚未解决的临床问题之一。 ACCORD,ADVANCE和VADT研究的最新结果挑战了传统观念,即所有糖尿病患者均应追求较低的糖化血红蛋白值。可能影响强化血糖管理是否可取的因素包括糖尿病的持续时间,既往存在的大血管疾病,对血糖的了解不足以及严重的合并症。糖化血红蛋白目标应考虑这些因素,并针对每位患者进行个性化设置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号