...
首页> 外文期刊>Food chemical news >The Shifting Status of BPA under California's Proposition 65
【24h】

The Shifting Status of BPA under California's Proposition 65

机译:根据加州65号提案,BPA的转移地位

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The California Environmental Protection Agency's (Cal/EPA) Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) just does not want to give up on trying to include bisphenol A (BPA) on the state's Proposition 65 list of reproductive toxicants. After its Developmental and Reproductive Toxicant Identification Committee (DART-IC) voted unanimously in 2009 against the inclusion of BPA on the state's Proposition 65 list of reproductive toxicants, the office tried earlier this year to include BPA by way of another listing mechanism. However, OEHHA was thwarted once more, as the Sacramento County Superior Court, on April 19, issued a preliminary injunction ordering removal of the listing pending its final determination in a case brought by the American Chemistry Council (ACC) (see ravApril 26, 2013, Page 19).
机译:加州环境保护局(Cal / EPA)的环境健康危害评估办公室(OEHHA)只是不想放弃试图将双酚A(BPA)列入该州的65号提案生殖毒物清单。在其发展与生殖毒性鉴定委员会(DART-IC)于2009年一致投票反对将双酚A列入该州的第65号提案生殖毒物清单之后,该办公室于今年早些时候试图通过另一种上市机制将双酚A包括在内。然而,OEHHA再次受挫,因为萨克拉曼多县高等法院于4月19日发布初步禁令,命令在美国化学理事会(ACC)提起的最终裁决之前下令删除该清单(请参阅ravApril 26,2013 ,第19页)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号