首页> 外文期刊>Contemporary clinical trials >Controlling anal incontinence in women by performing anal exercises with biofeedback or loperamide (CAPABLe) trial: Design and methods
【24h】

Controlling anal incontinence in women by performing anal exercises with biofeedback or loperamide (CAPABLe) trial: Design and methods

机译:通过使用生物反馈或洛哌丁胺(CAPABLe)试验进行肛门锻炼来控制女性的肛门失禁:设计和方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The goals of this trial are to determine the efficacy and safety of two treatments for women experiencing fecal incontinence. First, we aim to compare the use of loperamide to placebo and second, to compare the use of anal sphincter exercises with biofeedback to usual care. The primary outcome is the change from baseline in the St. Mark's (Vaizey) Score 24 weeks after treatment initiation. As a Pelvic Floor Disorders Network (PFDN) trial, subjects are enrolling from eight PFDN clinical centers across the United States. A centralized data coordinating center supervises data collection and analysis. These two first-line treatments for fecal incontinence are being investigated simultaneously using a two-by-two randomized factorial design: a medication intervention (loperamide versus placebo) and a pelvic floor strength and sensory training intervention (anal sphincter exercises with manometry-assisted biofeedback versus usual care using an educational pamphlet). Interventionists providing the anal sphincter exercise training with biofeedback have received standardized training and assessment. Symptom severity, diary, standardized anorectal manometry and health-related quality of life out-comes are assessed using validated instruments administered by researchers masked to randomized interventions. Cost effectiveness analyses will be performed using prospectively collected data on care costs and resource utilization. This article describes the rationale and design of this randomized trial, focusing on specific research concepts of interest to researchers in the field of female pelvic floor disorders and all other providers who care for patients with fecal incontinence. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:该试验的目的是确定两种治疗大便失禁妇女的疗效和安全性。首先,我们旨在比较洛哌丁胺和安慰剂的使用,其次,比较肛门括约肌运动和生物反馈与常规护理的使用。主要结局是治疗开始后24周的圣马克(Vaizey)评分相对于基线的变化。作为骨盆底疾病网络(PFDN)的一项试验,研究对象正在美国各地的8个PFDN临床中心招募。集中式数据协调中心负责监督数据收集和分析。粪便失禁的这两种一线治疗方法正在通过两乘二的随机因子设计同时进行研究:药物干预(洛培酰胺与安慰剂)和骨盆底肌力和感觉训练干预(肛门括约肌锻炼及测压辅助生物反馈)与使用教育手册的常规护理相比)。提供生物反馈的肛门括约肌锻炼培训的干预专家已经接受了标准化的培训和评估。症状严重程度,日记,标准化的肛门直肠测压法和与健康相关的生活质量结局均由研究人员使用经随机干预掩盖的经过验证的仪器进行评估。成本效益分析将使用前瞻性收集的护理费用和资源利用数据进行。本文介绍了这项随机试验的原理和设计,重点关注女性骨盆底疾病领域的研究人员以及所有其他护理大便失禁患者的研究人员感兴趣的特定研究概念。 (C)2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号