首页> 外文期刊>Critical care : >Entropy and bispectral index for assessment of sedation, analgesia and the effects of unpleasant stimuli in critically ill patients: an observational study.
【24h】

Entropy and bispectral index for assessment of sedation, analgesia and the effects of unpleasant stimuli in critically ill patients: an observational study.

机译:熵和双谱指数用于评估重症患者的镇静,镇痛作用和不愉快刺激的效果:一项观察性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Sedative and analgesic drugs are frequently used in critically ill patients. Their overuse may prolong mechanical ventilation and length of stay in the intensive care unit. Guidelines recommend use of sedation protocols that include sedation scores and trials of sedation cessation to minimize drug use. We evaluated processed electroencephalography (response and state entropy and bispectral index) as an adjunct to monitoring effects of commonly used sedative and analgesic drugs and intratracheal suctioning. METHODS: Electrodes for monitoring bispectral index and entropy were placed on the foreheads of 44 critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation and who previously had no brain dysfunction. Sedation was targeted individually using the Ramsay Sedation Scale, recorded every 2 hours or more frequently. Use of and indications for sedative and analgesic drugs and intratracheal suctioning were recorded manually and using a camera. At the end of the study, processed electroencephalographical and haemodynamic variables collected before and after each drug application and tracheal suctioning were analyzed. Ramsay score was used for comparison with processed electroencephalography when assessed within 15 minutes of an intervention. RESULTS: The indications for boli of sedative drugs exhibited statistically significant, albeit clinically irrelevant, differences in terms of their association with processed electroencephalographical parameters. Electroencephalographical variables decreased significantly after bolus, but a specific pattern in electroencephalographical variables before drug administration was not identified. The same was true for opiate administration. At both 30 minutes and 2 minutes before intratracheal suctioning, there was no difference in electroencephalographical or clinical signs in patients who had or had not received drugs 10 minutes before suctioning. Among patients who received drugs, electroencephalographical parameters returned to baseline more rapidly. In those cases in which Ramsay score was assessed before the event, processed electroencephalography exhibited high variation. CONCLUSIONS: Unpleasant or painful stimuli and sedative and analgesic drugs are associated with significant changes in processed electroencephalographical parameters. However, clinical indications for drug administration were not reflected by these electroencephalographical parameters, and barely by sedation level before drug administration or tracheal suction. This precludes incorporation of entropy and bispectral index as target variables for sedation and analgesia protocols in critically ill patients.
机译:摘要:简介:镇静药和镇痛药常用于重症患者。过度使用它们可能会延长机械通气并延长重症监护病房的住院时间。指南建议使用镇静方案,包括镇静评分和镇静试验,以最大程度地减少药物使用。我们评估了经过处理的脑电图(反应和状态熵和双谱指数)作为辅助手段,以监测常用的镇静和镇痛药物以及气管内抽吸的效果。方法:将用于监测双光谱指数和熵的电极放在44名需要机械通气且以前没有脑功能障碍的危重患者的额头上。使用Ramsay镇静量表对镇静进行单独靶向,每2小时或更频繁地记录一次。镇静和镇痛药物的使用和适应症以及气管内抽吸均通过手动方式记录下来,并使用照相机记录下来。在研究结束时,分析了每次用药和气管抽吸前后的脑电图和血流动力学变量。在干预的15分钟内评估时,将Ramsay得分与经过处理的脑电图进行比较。结果:镇静剂的适应症在临床上与脑电图参数的关联方面显示出统计学上的显着性差异,尽管与临床无关。推注后,脑电图变量显着降低,但未确定给药前的脑电图变量的特定模式。阿片给药也是如此。在气管内抽吸前30分钟和2分钟,在抽吸前10分钟曾接受或未接受药物治疗的患者的脑电图或临床体征均无差异。在接受药物治疗的患者中,脑电图参数恢复到基线的速度更快。在事件发生前评估Ramsay得分的情况下,经过处理的脑电图表现出很大的差异。结论:令人不快或痛苦的刺激以及镇静和止痛药与脑电图处理参数的显着变化有关。然而,这些药物的脑电图参数并没有反映出药物治疗的临床指征,而药物给药或气管吸痰前的镇静水平却很少。这排除了将熵和双光谱指数纳入危重患者镇静和镇痛方案的目标变量的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号