首页> 外文期刊>Journal of research in medical sciences : >ASSESSMENT OF SEDATION LEVEL IN CRITICALLY ILL MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS: IS BISPECTRAL INDEX CORRELATED WITH RICHMOND AGITATION–SEDATION SCALE?
【24h】

ASSESSMENT OF SEDATION LEVEL IN CRITICALLY ILL MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS: IS BISPECTRAL INDEX CORRELATED WITH RICHMOND AGITATION–SEDATION SCALE?

机译:机械通气严重危重患者的镇静水平评估:双歧指数是否与里奇蒙德的镇静-镇静标度相关?

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The intensivist should be avoided over or under sedation in mechanically ventilated patients. There are controversies in validity of bispectral index (BIS) in the management of intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate sedation level in sedated and mechanically ventilated patients in our ICU using BIS and Richmond agitation–sedation scale (RASS, as a valid tool) and to determine the correlation between these two methods of evaluation.METHODS: Following the institutional research committee approval, we prospectively determined the sedation level in 33 patients aged 20-75 years who were mechanically ventilated and sedated routinely using intravenous diazepam (0.05 – 0.1 mg/kg/6 hr) combined with intravenous morphine (0.05 – 0.1 mg/kg/6 hr) in central ICU of Al-Zahra hospital. In each patient, we assessed BIS (0 to 100) values and also RASS (-5 to +4) twice a day, two hours after receiving systemic sedation in the morning and evening during mechanical ventilation period. Appropriate sedation score was considered -2 and -3 on RASS and 70 to 80 in BIS. Lower or greater values were considered as under- or over-sedation, respectively. Data were analyzed using chi-square and spearman's correlation tests.RESULTS: In this study, sedation level was assessed in patients using RASS (201 times) and BIS (201 times) methods. The frequency (percent) of under-sedated, appropriately sedated and over-sedated patients with BIS assessments were 121 (60.2%), 35 (17.4%) and 45 (22.4%), respectively. These values for RASS assessments were 196 (97.5%), zero, and 5 (2.5%), respectively. There was a weak correlation between BIS and RASS for determination of sedation level (P = 0, r = 0.245).CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that most of our ICU patients were under-sedated. BIS was poorly correlated with RASS in assessing the depth of sedation in mechanically ventilated patients.
机译:背景:在机械通气患者中,应避免使用强效镇静剂。在重症监护病房(ICU)患者的管理中,双光谱指数(BIS)的有效性存在争议。这项研究的目的是使用BIS和Richmond激动镇静量表(RASS,作为有效工具)评估我们ICU镇静和机械通气患者的镇静水平,并确定这两种评估方法之间的相关性。经机构研究委员会批准,我们前瞻性地确定了33例20-75岁的患者,他们采用静脉地西epa(0.05 – 0.1 mg / kg / 6 hr)联合静脉内吗啡(0.05 – 0.1 mg)进行常规机械通气和镇静/ kg / 6 hr)在Al-Zahra医院的ICU中心。在每例患者的机械通气期间,每天早晨和晚上进行全身镇静后两个小时,我们每天两次评估BIS(0至100)值,还评估RASS(-5至+4)值。在RASS上将适当的镇静评分视为-2和-3,在BIS中将其视为70至80。较低或较高的值分别被认为是镇静不足或过度使用的。结果:本研究使用RASS(201倍)和BIS(201倍)方法评估患者的镇静水平。进行BIS评估的镇静不足,镇静适当和镇静过度的患者的频率(百分比)分别为121(60.2%),35(17.4%)和45(22.4%)。 RASS评估的这些值分别为196(97.5%),零和5(2.5%)。 BIS和RASS之间在确定镇静水平方面没有很强的相关性(P = 0,r = 0.245)。结论:这项研究表明我们大多数ICU患者的镇静作用均不足。在评估机械通气患者的镇静深度时,BIS与RASS的相关性很差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号