...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing >Entropy correlates with Richmond Agitation Sedation State in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients
【24h】

Entropy correlates with Richmond Agitation Sedation State in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients

机译:熵与机械通气危重患者的列治文躁动镇静状态相关

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Sedation is routinely used in intensive care units. However due to absence of objective scoring systems like Bispectral Index and entropy our ability to regulate the degree of sedation is limited. This deficiency is further highlighted by the fact that agitation scores used in intensive care units (ICU) have no role in paralyzed patients. The present study compares entropy as a sedation scoring modality with Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients in an ICU. Twenty-seven, mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients of either sex, 16-65 years of age, were studied over a period of 24 h. They received a standard sedation regimen consisting of a bolus dose of propofol 0.5 mg/kg and fentanyl 1 mug/kg followed by infusions of propofol and fentanyl ranging from 1.5 to 5 mg/kg/h and 0.5 to 2.0 ug/kg/h, respectively. Clinically relevant values of RASS for optimal ICU sedation (between 0 and -3) in non-paralyzed patients were compared to corresponding entropy values, to find if any significant correlation exists between the two. These entropy measurements were obtained using the Datex-Oh-meda-M-Entropy? module. This module is presently not approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for monitoring sedation in ICU. A total of 527 readings were obtained. There was a statistically significant correlation between the state entropy (SE) and RASS [Spearman's rho/ r_s = 0.334, p < 0.0001]; response entropy (RE) and RASS [Spearman's rho/r_s = 0.341, p < 0.0001]). For adequate sedation as judged by a RASS value of 0 to -3, the mean SE was 57.86 ± 16.50 and RE was 67.75 ± 15.65. The present study illustrates that entropy correlates with RASS (between scores 0 and -3) when assessing the level of sedation in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.
机译:重症监护病房通常使用镇静剂。但是,由于缺乏诸如双光谱指数和熵之类的客观评分系统,我们调节镇静程度的能力受到限制。重症监护病房(ICU)中使用的躁动评分在瘫痪患者中不起作用这一事实进一步突出了这种缺陷。本研究比较了ICU机械通气,危重患者中的熵作为镇静评分方式与里士满躁动镇静量表(RASS)的比较。在24小时内研究了27名16-65岁的机械通气,危重病患者(男女)。他们接受了标准的镇静方案,其中包括推注剂量的丙泊酚0.5 mg / kg和芬太尼1杯/ kg,然后输注1.5至5 mg / kg / h和0.5至2.0 ug / kg / h的丙泊酚和芬太尼,分别。将非瘫痪患者最佳ICU镇静RASS的临床相关值(介于0和-3之间)与相应的熵值进行比较,以找出两者之间是否存在显着相关性。这些熵测量是使用Datex-Oh-meda-M-Entropy?模块。该模块目前尚未获得美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的批准,无法监测ICU中的镇静作用。总共获得了527个读数。状态熵(SE)与RASS之间存在统计上的显着相关性[Spearman的rho / r_s = 0.334,p <0.0001];响应熵(RE)和RASS [Spearman的rho / r_s = 0.341,p <0.0001]。对于RASS值为0至-3的镇静剂,平均SE为57.86±16.50,RE为67.75±15.65。本研究表明,在评估机械通气危重患者的镇静水平时,熵与RASS相关(介于0和-3之间)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号