...
首页> 外文期刊>Contraception >A randomized controlled study of two educational interventions on adherence with oral contraceptives and condoms
【24h】

A randomized controlled study of two educational interventions on adherence with oral contraceptives and condoms

机译:两种口服避孕药和避孕套依从性教育干预措施的随机对照研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: The study was conducted to examine the effectiveness of two different interventions on oral contraception (OC) adherence and condom use. Study Design: A total of 1,155 women 16-24 years of age requesting OC were randomized to receive either face-to-face behavioral counseling and education at their baseline clinic visit (C group; n= 383) or this same intervention followed by monthly phone calls for 6 months (C+P group; n= 384) or standard care (S group; n= 388). Phone interviews at 3, 6 and 12 months after the initial visit as well as a medical record review assessed OC continuation, condom use and several other secondary and clinically meaningful outcomes such as pregnancy and sexually transmitted infection (STI) rates and correct use of pills. Results: The interventions did not have a significant effect on OC continuation after 3 (C+P: 58%; C: 50%; S: 55%), 6 (39%; 32%; 37%) or 12 months (20%; 18%; 20%) (p>.05). Condom use at last sexual intercourse did not differ by intervention methods (p>.05). Moreover, no effect was observed on pregnancy [S=48 (12.4%), C = 63 (16.5%), C+P=52 (13.5%); p=.22] and STI [S=18 (4.6%), C=12 (3.1%), C+P=13 (3.4%); p=.50] rates, and mean number of correctly used pill packs (p=.06). However, those randomized to C+P were more likely than C and S patients to identify a cue and report that the cue worked as a reminder to take their OC on time based on 3 and 6 months follow-up information (p<.01 for all relationships). Conclusions: Neither intervention in this study improved OC adherence among young women.
机译:背景:这项研究旨在检查两种不同干预措施对口服避孕药(OC)坚持和使用避孕套的有效性。研究设计:总共1,155名16-24岁的要求OC的女性被随机分配在基线门诊就诊时接受面对面的行为咨询和教育(C组; n = 383),或者是同样的干预措施,然后是每月一次六个月的电话(C + P组; n = 384)或标准护理(S组; n = 388)。首次访问后3、6和12个月的电话采访以及病历检查评估了OC的持续性,避孕套的使用以及其他一些次要的和临床上有意义的结果,例如怀孕和性传播感染(STI)率以及正确使用药。结果:干预在3(C + P:58%; C:50%; S:55%),6(39%; 32%; 37%)或12个月(20)之后的OC持续时间没有显着影响%; 18%; 20%)(p> .05)。在最后一次性交中避孕套的使用没有因干预方法而异(p> .05)。此外,未观察到对妊娠的影响[S = 48(12.4%),C = 63(16.5%),C + P = 52(13.5%); p = .22]和STI [S = 18(4.6%),C = 12(3.1%),C + P = 13(3.4%); p = .50]的比率,以及正确使用的药盒的平均数量(p = .06)。但是,与C和S患者相比,被随机分配到C + P的患者更有可能发现提示并报告提示是根据3个月和6个月的随访信息提示按时服用OC(p <.01对于所有关系)。结论:这项研究中的两种干预均未改善年轻女性的OC依从性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号