首页> 外文期刊>Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. >Clinical Efficacy of Polymyxin Monotherapy versus Nonvalidated Polymyxin Combination Therapy versus Validated Polymyxin Combination Therapy in Extensively Drug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacillus Infections
【24h】

Clinical Efficacy of Polymyxin Monotherapy versus Nonvalidated Polymyxin Combination Therapy versus Validated Polymyxin Combination Therapy in Extensively Drug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacillus Infections

机译:多粘菌素单药疗法与未经验证的多粘菌素联合疗法与经验证的多粘菌素联合疗法在广泛耐药的革兰氏阴性杆菌感染中的临床疗效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Polymyxins have emerged as a last-resort treatment of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative Bacillus (GNB) infections, which present a growing threat. Individualized polymyxin-based antibiotic combinations selected on the basis of the results of in vitro combination testing may be required to optimize therapy. A retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients receiving polymyxins for XDR GNB infections from 2009 to 2014 was conducted to compare the treatment outcomes between patients receiving polymyxin monotherapy (MT), nonvalidated polymyxin combination therapy (NVCT), and in vitro combination testing-validated polymyxin combination therapy (VCT). The primary and secondary outcomes were infection-related mortality and microbiological eradication, respectively. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) between treatment groups were assessed. A total of 291 patients (patients receiving MT, n = 58; patients receiving NVCT, n = 203; patients receiving VCT, n = 30) were included. The overall infection-related mortality rate was 23.0% (67 patients). In the multivariable analysis, treatment of XDR GNB infections with MT (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 8.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.56 to 46.05) and NVCT (aOR, 5.75; 95% CI, 1.25 to 25.73) was associated with an increased risk of infection-related mortality compared to that with treatment with VCT. A higher Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score (aOR, 1.14; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.21) and a higher Charlson comorbidity index (aOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.47) were also independently associated with an increased risk of infection-related mortality. No increase in the incidence of ADRs was observed in the VCT group. The use of an individualized antibiotic combination which was selected on the basis of the results of in vitro combination testing was associated with significantly lower rates of infection-related mortality in patients with XDR GNB infections. Future prospective randomized studies will be required to validate these findings.
机译:多粘菌素已作为对广泛耐药性(XDR)革兰氏阴性芽孢杆菌(GNB)感染的最后治疗方法出现,这种感染正日益增加。为优化治疗方法,可能需要根据体外联合试验的结果选择基于个体的多粘菌素类抗生素组合。对2009年至2014年接受多粘菌素治疗XDR GNB感染的住院患者进行的一项回顾性队列研究,比较了接受多粘菌素单一疗法(MT),未验证的多粘菌素联合疗法(NVCT)和体外联合试验验证的多粘菌素联合疗法的患者的治疗结果治疗(VCT)。主要和次要结果分别是与感染相关的死亡率和根除微生物。评估治疗组之间的药物不良反应(ADR)。总共包括291名患者(接受MT的患者,n = 58;接受NVCT的患者,n = 203;接受VCT的患者,n = 30)。总体感染相关死亡率为23.0%(67例患者)。在多变量分析中,使用MT(校正比值比[aOR],8.49; 95%置信区间[CI],1.56至46.05)和NVCT(aOR,5.75; 95%CI,1.25至25.73)治疗XDR GNB感染与使用VCT治疗相比,与感染相关死亡率的风险增加有关。较高的急性生理和慢性健康评估II(APACHE II)评分(aOR,1.14; 95%CI 1.07至1.21)和较高的Charlson合并症指数(aOR,1.28; 95%CI,1.11至1.47)也与与感染有关的死亡风险增加。 VCT组未观察到ADR发生率增加。根据体外联合试验结果选择的个体化抗生素组合的使用与XDR GNB感染患者的感染相关死亡率显着降低有关。需要未来的前瞻性随机研究来验证这些发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号