...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine >Polymyxin Monotherapy vs. Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Multidrug-resistant Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
【24h】

Polymyxin Monotherapy vs. Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Multidrug-resistant Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

机译:多药物单药治疗多药物抗性感染的多药物单药治疗方法:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives:The objective of this review was to compare the effectiveness of Colistin monotherapy and combination therapy for the treatment of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections.Data sources:PubMed, Cochrane Library.Study eligibility interventions and exclusions:In this systematic review, we included all retrospective and prospective studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared intravenous polymyxin monotherapy and combination therapy with any other antibiotic for treating multidrug-resistant infections. Studies using inhaled polymyxins with 5 or less than 5 patients were excluded. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality and if not reported at day 30 we extracted and documented the closest time point. Both crude outcome rates and adjusted effect estimates were extracted for mortality.Study appraisal data extraction and synthesis:Search string used was "(Colistin OR polymyxin) AND (Enterobacteriaceae OR Klebsiella OR Acinetobacter OR Escherichia coli OR Pseudomonas) AND (random OR prospective OR retrospective OR cohort OR observational OR blind)." Thirty-nine studies were included in our analysis; out of which 6 RCTs were included and 9 studies used carbapenem as the adjunctive antibiotic. Each study was screened and reviewed for eligibility independently by two authors and data extrapolated on an Excel sheet.Results:The meta-analysis of polymyxin monotherapy vs. combination therapy in multidrug-resistant infections yielded an odds ratio (OR) of 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-1.01) with minimal heterogeneity (I 2 = 40%), whereas pooled analysis of this comparison in studies that included carbapenem as combination therapy yielded an OR of 0.64 (CI: 0.40-1.03; I 2 = 62%). Likewise, the pooled analysis of the RCTs yielded an OR of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.58-1.16, I 2 = 22%). All these showed no statistical significance. However, it was seen that polymyxin combination therapy was more effective in multidrug-resistant infections compared to polymyxin monotherapy. The effectiveness was more glaring when carbapenems were used as the combination drug instead of any other antibiotic and more so in many in vitro studies that used polymyxin combination therapy.Conclusion:Although statistically insignificant, it would be prudent to use polymyxin combination therapy to treat multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli (GNB) infection over monotherapy with preference to use carbapenem as the adjunct alongside polymyxins.How to cite this article:Samal S, Mishra SB, Patra SK, Rath A, Dash A, Nayak B, et al. Polymyxin Monotherapy vs. Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Multidrug-resistant Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(2):199-206.Copyright ? 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.
机译:目的:本综述的目的是比较Colistin单药治疗和组合治疗用于治疗多药物革兰阴性细菌感染的疗效.DATA来源:PubMed,Cochrane图书馆。学生资格干预和排除:在这个系统评论中,我们包括所有回顾性和前瞻性研究和随机对照试验(RCT),其与任何其他抗生素相比,将静脉多酶单药治疗和组合治疗用于治疗多药抗性感染。用吸入的多粘蛋白具有5例或少于5名患者的研究。主要结果为30天的全导致死亡率,如果在第30天没有报告,我们提取并记录了最近的时间点。提取粗糙结果率和调整后的效果估计以进行死亡率。研究使用的评估数据提取和合成:使用的搜索字符串是“(Colistin或polymyxin)和(肠杆菌痤疮或克雷布氏菌或雌激素或大肠杆菌或假鼠)和(随机或潜在或回顾性或队列或观察或盲目)。“我们的分析中包含了三十九项研究;其中包含6个RCT,9项研究用CarbapeNem作为辅助抗生素。通过两位作者和数据在Excel板上独立筛选并审查每个研究。结果:多药物抗性感染中的多种辛in单药治疗的Meta分析与多药物抗性感染的组合疗法产生0.81(95%)置信区间[CI]:0.65-1.01)具有最小的异质性(I 2 = 40%),而汇总分析包括CarbapeNem作为联合治疗的研究中的这种比较产生的(CI:0.40-1.03; I 2 = 62%)。同样地,RCT的汇总分析产生或0.82(95%CI:0.58-1.16,I 2 = 22%)。所有这些都没有显示出统计学意义。然而,有与多药物单疗法相比,多药物抗性感染的多药物联合治疗更有效。当使用多种多辛素组合治疗的许多体外研究中使用碳癌蛋白剂而不是任何其他抗生素等等时,有效性更加明显。结论:虽然统计学上微不足道,但使用聚霉素联合治疗治疗多药物将是谨慎的-Resistant革兰氏阴性杆菌(GNB)对单一疗法感染,优先使用CarbapeNem作为Polymyxins的辅助。如何引用本文:Samal S,Mishra Sb,Patra Sk,Rath A,Dash A,Nayak B等人。多药物单药治疗多药物抗性感染的组合治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。印度j crit care med 2021; 25(2):199-206.copyright? 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers(P)有限公司

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号