首页> 外文期刊>Analytical chemistry >Toward Rapid, High-Sensitivity, Volume-Constrained Biomarker Quantification and Validation using Backscattering Interferometry
【24h】

Toward Rapid, High-Sensitivity, Volume-Constrained Biomarker Quantification and Validation using Backscattering Interferometry

机译:使用反向散射干涉法进行快速,高灵敏度,体积受限的生物标志物定量和验证

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Realizing personalized medicine, which promises to enable early disease detection, efficient diagnostic staging, and therapeutic efficacy monitoring, hinges on biomarker quantification in patient samples. Yet, the lack of a sensitive technology and assay methodology to rapidly validate biomarker candidates continues to be a bottleneck for clinical translation. In our first direct and quantitative comparison of backscattering interferometry (BSI) to fluorescence sensing by ELISA, we show that BSI could aid in overcoming this limitation. The analytical validation study was performed against ELISA for two biomarkers for lung cancer detection: Cyfra 21-1 and Galectin-7. Spiked serum was used for calibration and comparison of analytical figures of merit, followed by analysis of blinded patient samples. Using the ELISA antibody as the probe chemistry in a mix-and-read assay, BSI provided significantly lower detection limits for spiked serum samples with each of the biomarkers. The limit of quantification (LOQ) for Cyrfa-21-1 was measured to be 230 pg/mL for BSI versus 4000 pg/mL for ELISA, and for Galectin-7, it was 13 pg/mL versus 500 pg/mL. The coefficient of variation for 5 day, triplicate determinations was <15% for BSI and <10% for ELISA. The two techniques correlated well, ranging from 3-29% difference for Cyfra 21-1 in a blinded patient sample analysis. The label-free and free-solution operation of BSI allowed for a significant improvement in analysis speed, with greater ease, improved LOQ values, and excellent day-to-day reproducibility. In this unoptimized format, BSI required 5.5-fold less sample quantity needed for ELISA (a 10 point calibration curve measured in triplicate required 36 μL of serum for BSI vs 200 μL for ELISA). The results indicate that the BSI platform can enable rapid, sensitive analytical validation of serum biomarkers and should significantly impact the validation bottleneck of biomarkers.
机译:实现个性化医学有望实现早期疾病检测,有效的诊断分期和治疗效果监测,这取决于患者样品中生物标志物的定量。然而,缺乏快速验证生物标志物候选物的灵敏技术和测定方法仍然是临床翻译的瓶颈。在我们通过ELISA进行的反向散射干涉法(BSI)与荧光传感的首次直接定量比较中,我们表明BSI可以帮助克服这一局限性。针对ELISA的两种生物标记物(针对Cyfra 21-1和Galectin-7)针对ELISA进行了分析验证研究。掺入的血清用于校正和比较分析品质因数,然后分析盲目患者样品。在混合阅读实验中,使用ELISA抗体作为探针化学成分,BSI大大降低了每种生物标记物对加标血清样品的检测限。对于BSI,Cyrfa-21-1的定量限(LOQ)测得为230 pg / mL,而ELISA为4000 pg / mL,而Galectin-7的定量限为13 pg / mL,对500 pg / mL。 5天一式三份的变异系数,BSI为<15%,ELISA为<10%。两种技术的相关性很好,在盲人患者样品分析中,Cyfra 21-1的差异为3-29%。 BSI的无标签和自由溶液操作大大提高了分析速度,更加轻松,提高了LOQ值,并具有出色的日常重现性。在这种未优化的格式中,BSI所需的ELISA样品量要少5.5倍(一式三份测量的10点校准曲线对于BSI而言需要36μL血清,而对于ELISA需要200μL)。结果表明,BSI平台可以实现对血清生物标志物的快速,灵敏的分析验证,并且应显着影响生物标志物的验证瓶颈。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号