首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>ACS AuthorChoice >Toward Rapid High-Sensitivity Volume-ConstrainedBiomarker Quantification and Validation using Backscattering Interferometry
【2h】

Toward Rapid High-Sensitivity Volume-ConstrainedBiomarker Quantification and Validation using Backscattering Interferometry

机译:朝着快速高灵敏度体积受限的方向发展使用反向散射干涉法对生物标志物进行定量和验证

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Realizing personalized medicine, which promises to enable early disease detection, efficient diagnostic staging, and therapeutic efficacy monitoring, hinges on biomarker quantification in patient samples. Yet, the lack of a sensitive technology and assay methodology to rapidly validate biomarker candidates continues to be a bottleneck for clinical translation. In our first direct and quantitative comparison of backscattering interferometry (BSI) to fluorescence sensing by ELISA, we show that BSI could aid in overcoming this limitation. The analytical validation study was performed against ELISA for two biomarkers for lung cancer detection: Cyfra 21-1 and Galectin-7. Spiked serum was used for calibration and comparison of analytical figures of merit, followed by analysis of blinded patient samples. Using the ELISA antibody as the probe chemistry in a mix-and-read assay, BSI provided significantly lower detection limits for spiked serum samples with each of the biomarkers. The limit of quantification (LOQ) for Cyrfa-21-1 was measured to be 230 pg/mL for BSI versus 4000 pg/mL for ELISA, and for Galectin-7,it was 13 pg/mL versus 500 pg/mL. The coefficient of variation for5 day, triplicate determinations was <15% for BSI and <10% forELISA. The two techniques correlated well, ranging from 3–29%difference for Cyfra 21-1 in a blinded patient sample analysis. Thelabel-free and free-solution operation of BSI allowed for a significantimprovement in analysis speed, with greater ease, improved LOQ values,and excellent day-to-day reproducibility. In this unoptimized format,BSI required 5.5-fold less sample quantity needed for ELISA (a 10point calibration curve measured in triplicate required 36 μLof serum for BSI vs 200 μL for ELISA). The results indicatethat the BSI platform can enable rapid, sensitive analytical validationof serum biomarkers and should significantly impact the validationbottleneck of biomarkers.
机译:实现个性化医学,有望实现早期疾病检测,有效的诊断分期和治疗效果监测,取决于患者样品中生物标志物的定量。然而,缺乏快速验证生物标志物候选物的灵敏技术和测定方法仍然是临床翻译的瓶颈。在我们通过ELISA进行的反向散射干涉法(BSI)与荧光传感的首次直接定量比较中,我们表明BSI可以帮助克服这一局限性。针对ELISA的两种生物标记物(针对Cyfra 21-1和Galectin-7)针对ELISA进行了分析验证研究。掺入的血清用于校正和比较分析品质因数,然后分析盲目患者样品。在混合阅读实验中,使用ELISA抗体作为探针化学成分,BSI显着降低了每种生物标记物对加标血清样品的检测限。对于BSI,Cyrfa-21-1的定量限(LOQ)为230 pg / mL,而ELISA和Galectin-7的定量限为4000 pg / mL,它是13 pg / mL,而500 pg / mL。的变异系数5天,一式三份测定的BSI <15%,<10%ELISA。两种技术的相关性很好,范围为3–29%盲患者样品分析中Cyfra 21-1的差异。的BSI的无标签和无溶液操作可显着提高更快地提高分析速度,提高LOQ值,以及出色的日常可重复性。在这种未优化的格式中,BSI所需的ELISA样品量减少了5.5倍(10一式三份测得的点校准曲线需要36μLBSI的血清比ELISA的200μL)。结果表明BSI平台可以实现快速,灵敏的分析验证血清生物标志物的使用,应显着影响验证生物标志物的瓶颈。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号