首页> 外文期刊>Analytical chemistry >Systematic Evaluation of Solid-Phase Microextraction Coatings for Untargeted Metabolomic Profiling of Biological Fluids by Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
【24h】

Systematic Evaluation of Solid-Phase Microextraction Coatings for Untargeted Metabolomic Profiling of Biological Fluids by Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry

机译:液相色谱-质谱法对固相微萃取涂层对生物流体进行非靶向代谢组学分析的系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this study, we propose for the first time the use of solid-phase microextraction (SPME) in combination with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for untargeted metabolomic profiling of biological fluids. To achieve this goal, we first systematically evaluated 42 different SPME coatings for the extraction of 36 metabolites from different chemical classes and of widely varying polarities (log P range of -7.9 to 7.4) in order to identify SPME coatings which are the most suitable for metabolomic studies and to improve the extraction of polar metabolites over the existing commercial SPME devices. Three types of SPME coatings (mixed-mode coatings, polar-enhanced polystyrene-divinylbenzene, and phenylboronic acid) performed the best for simultaneous extraction of both hydrophilic and hydrophobic metabolites at physiological conditions, thus making them suitable for untargeted metabolomic profiling applications. A rapid and simple SPME method was then developed with single-use biocompatible mixed-mode coating for the metabolomic profiling of human plasma in combination with liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry on a benchtop Orbitrap system. This optimized SPME method was evaluated versus ultrafiltration and solvent precipitation in terms of metabolite coverage and method precision. SPME detected 1592-3320 features versus 2082-3245 features detected by solvent precipitation methods and 2093-2686 detected for ultrafiltration using the same pooled human plasma sample. Method precision of SPME ranged between 11percent and 18percent (expressed as median relative standard deviation (RSD) of n velence 7 replicates) versus 8-19percent for solvent precipitation and 20-22percent for ultrafiltration. The results demonstrate that the proposed SPME methodology reduces ionization suppression, provides free concentration information for hydrophobic analytes which are not detected by ultrafiltration methods, and can improve metabolite coverage over existing methodologies.
机译:在这项研究中,我们首次建议将固相微萃取(SPME)与液相色谱-质谱联用,用于生物流体的非靶向代谢组学分析。为了实现此目标,我们首先系统地评估了42种不同的SPME涂层,以提取来自不同化学类别和极性变化很大(log P范围为-7.9至7.4)的36种代谢产物,从而确定最适合用于代谢组学研究,并通过现有的商用SPME设备改善极性代谢物的提取。三种类型的SPME涂层(混合模式涂层,极性增强型聚苯乙烯-二乙烯基苯和苯基硼酸)在生理条件下同时萃取亲水性和疏水性代谢产物表现最佳,因此使其适合于非目标代谢组学分析应用。然后开发了一种快速,简单的SPME方法,该方法采用一次性生物相容性混合模式涂层,结合台式Orbitrap系统上的液相色谱-高分辨率质谱技术,用于人血浆的代谢组学分析。就代谢物覆盖率和方法精度而言,针对超滤和溶剂沉淀对优化的SPME方法进行了评估。 SPME使用同一沉淀人血浆样品检测到1592-3320特征,而使用溶剂沉淀法检测到2082-3245特征,使用超滤检测2093-2686。 SPME的方法精度介于11%和18%之间(表示为7次重复的中位相对标准偏差(RSD)),而溶剂沉淀的精确度为8-19%,超滤的精确度为20-22%。结果表明,提出的SPME方法减少了电离抑制,为超滤方法未检测到的疏水性分析物提供了自由浓度信息,并且可以改善现有方法的代谢物覆盖率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号