...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Physiology >Protein C and acute inflammation: a clinical and biological perspective.
【24h】

Protein C and acute inflammation: a clinical and biological perspective.

机译:蛋白C和急性炎症:临床和生物学角度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The protein C system plays an active role in modulating severe systemic inflammatory processes such as sepsis, trauma, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) via its anticoagulant and anti-inflammatory properties. Plasma levels of activated protein C (aPC) are lower than normal in acute inflammation in humans, except early after severe trauma when high plasma levels of aPC may play a mechanistic role in the development of posttraumatic coagulopathy. Thus, following positive results of preclinical studies, a clinical trial (PROWESS) with high continuous doses of recombinant human aPC given for 4 days demonstrated a survival benefit in patients with severe sepsis. This result was not confirmed by subsequent clinical trials, including the recently published PROWESS-SHOCK trial in patients with septic shock and a phase II trial with patients with nonseptic ARDS. A possible explanation for the major difference in outcome between PROWESS and PROWESS-SHOCK trials is that lung-protective ventilation was used for the patients included in the recent PROWESS-SHOCK, but not in the original PROWESS trial. Since up to 75% of sepsis originates from the lung, aPC treatment may not have added enough to the beneficial effect of lung-protective ventilation to show lower mortality. Thus whether aPC will continue to be used to modulate the acute inflammatory response in humans remains uncertain. Because recombinant human aPC has been withdrawn from the market, a better understanding of the complex interactions between coagulation and inflammation is needed before considering the development of new drugs that modulate both coagulation and acute inflammation in humans.
机译:C蛋白系统通过其抗凝血和抗炎特性,在调节严重的全身性炎症过程(如败血症,创伤和急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS))中发挥积极作用。在人类急性炎症中,活化蛋白C(aPC)的血浆水平低于正常水平,除非严重创伤后的早期,血浆中高水平的aPC可能在创伤后凝血病的发展中发挥机械作用。因此,根据临床前研究的积极结果,连续4天给予高剂量连续剂量重组人aPC的临床试验(PROWESS)在严重脓毒症患者中显示出生存获益。随后的临床试验并未证实这一结果,包括最近发表的脓毒性休克患者的PROWESS-SHOCK试验和非脓毒症ARDS的II期试验。 PROWESS试验与PROWESS-SHOCK试验之间主要差异的可能解释是,近期PROWESS-SHOCK试验中包括的患者使用了肺保护通气,但原始PROWESS试验中并未使用。由于高达75%的脓毒症起源于肺,因此aPC治疗可能不足以增加保护肺通气的有益效果,从而降低死亡率。因此,aPC是否会继续用于调节人类的急性炎症反应仍不确定。由于重组人aPC已退出市场,因此在考虑开发可调节人的凝血和急性炎症的新药之前,需要更好地了解凝血与炎症之间的复杂相互作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号