首页> 外文期刊>Behavioral Medicine >Assessing subjective daytime sleepiness: an internal state versus behavior approach.
【24h】

Assessing subjective daytime sleepiness: an internal state versus behavior approach.

机译:评估主观的白天嗜睡:一种内部状态与行为的方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The authors' purpose in the current study was to apply P. J. Lang's (1968, 1971, 1985) theory of multiple systems of emotional response to the study of subjective sleepiness. A total of 274 participants completed the Stanford Sleepiness Scale (SSS), the Profile of Mood States (POMS), three sleepiness-related Visual Analogue Scales (VAS), and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). The authors completed correlations and factor analysis of the 4 sleepiness measures. The SSS, POMS, and VAS measures were better correlated with each other than with the ESS. Similarly, the SSS, POMS, and VAS measures loaded highly onto one factor, whereas the ESS loaded highly onto a separate factor. These results indicated that the ESS measured a different aspect of subjective sleepiness than the SSS, POMS, or VAS. According to Lang's emotional responses theory, the ESS assessed a behavioral component of sleepiness, and the SSS, POMS, and VAS measures assessed an internal state related to sleepiness.
机译:作者在本研究中的目的是将P. J. Lang(1968,1971,1985)的多种情绪反应系统理论应用于主观嗜睡研究。共有274名参与者完成了斯坦福大学的嗜睡量表(SSS),情绪状态概况(POMS),三个与嗜睡有关的视觉类比量表(VAS)和爱华沃思嗜睡量表(ESS)。作者完成了4个嗜睡测量的相关性和因素分析。与ESS相比,SSS,POMS和VAS度量之间的关联更好。同样,SSS,POMS和VAS度量值高度加载到一个因素上,而ESS度量值高度加载到一个单独的因素上。这些结果表明,与SSS,POMS或VAS相比,ESS测量的主观嗜睡有所不同。根据Lang的情绪反应理论,ESS评估了嗜睡的行为成分,而SSS,POMS和VAS测评评估了与嗜睡有关的内部状态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号