...
首页> 外文期刊>Computers in Libraries >Copyright's (not so) little cousin, plagiarism
【24h】

Copyright's (not so) little cousin, plagiarism

机译:版权(并非如此)的小表弟,窃

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This is nothing new: Technology makes it easy to subvert legal and proper use of information in its various forms. Issues related to copyright apply in a similar vein to plagiarism. In fact, copyright abuse and plagiarism are like two sides of a permission coin--on the one side, people take without asking, and on the other side, people take without telling. We know that librarians work hard to support copyright protection, but what are they doing about plagiarism? Plagiarism is theft and lying--using information that doesn't belong to you and passing it off as your own. It is mostly thought of as a problem in education, usually pertaining to student abuses. But there are times when experts use materialwithout giving credit to the source--most recently in cases regarding historians Stephen Ambrose and Doris Kearns Goodwin. Putting too much of someone else's words, or even their ideas, into your own work without giving the owner credit is ethically andlegally wrong. FIGHTING PLAGIARISM: ONE TEACHER'S BATTLE This column is dedicated to my new hero, Christine Pelton, a high school teacher in rural Piper, Kansas. Several months ago, Pelton failed 28 students for plagiarizing and then resigned when the school board insisted she reverse her decision.The board had not only ordered her to give students partial credit, but they had even gone so far as to interfere with her duties by demanding she decrease the course's final project from 50 percent to 30 percent of the students' grades (evidently in a move to justify their actions). She quit not only because the board usurped her authority, but also because the students no longer showed her respect afterward. Students were given a warning at the beginning of the semester that cheating, including plagiarism, would not be tolerated. When papers were turned in, Pelton noticed similarities in many of them.
机译:这并不是什么新鲜事物:技术可以轻松颠覆各种形式信息的合法使用和正确使用。与版权相关的问题与窃类似。实际上,版权滥用和窃就像许可硬币的两个方面:一方面,人们不问而接受,而另一方面,人们不言而喻。我们知道图书馆员会努力支持版权保护,但是他们对窃有何看法? gi窃是盗窃和说谎-使用不属于您的信息并将其作为您自己的信息传播。人们普遍认为这是教育中的问题,通常与学生虐待有关。但是有时候专家会使用材料而不注明出处-最近是在史学家史蒂芬·安布罗斯(Stephen Ambrose)和多里斯·基恩斯(Doris Kearns Goodwin)的案例中。在道德上和法律上错误地将别人的话,甚至他们的想法放到自己的作品中而没有给予所有者信任是错误的。 PLA窃:一位老师的战斗本专栏专门介绍我的新英雄克里斯汀·佩尔顿,她是堪萨斯州乡村吹笛者的高中老师。几个月前,佩尔顿(Pelton)使28名学生窃失败,然后在校务委员会坚持要求她撤销决定时辞职,董事会不仅命令她给予学生部分学分,甚至甚至干扰了她的职责。要求她将课程的最终项目从学生成绩的50%降低到30%(显然是为了证明自己的行为合理)。她之所以辞职,不仅是因为董事会篡夺了她的权威,而且还因为学生后来不再表现出对她的尊重。在学期开始时,警告学生不要容忍包括that窃在内的作弊行为。上交论文时,佩尔顿注意到其中许多相似之处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号