...
首页> 外文期刊>Computers, informatics, nursing: CIN >Computerized versus paper-and-pencil testing methods for a nursing certification examination: a review of the literature.
【24h】

Computerized versus paper-and-pencil testing methods for a nursing certification examination: a review of the literature.

机译:护理认证考试的计算机测试与纸笔测试的比较:文献综述。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In conjunction with the decision of the Oncology Nursing Certification Corporation (ONCC) to computerize its examinations, the literature was reviewed to identify comparative studies of computerized versus paper-and-pencil testing methods and to determine the relative advantages of each. Data sources included journal articles and newsletter features identified via the ERIC, CINAHL, and PubMed databases or through frequent citation in the literature. The majority of studies found test scores to be independent of delivery mode. Several advantages of computerized testing were identified, including scheduling convenience, instant scoring capability, and enhanced security. One disadvantage may be an increase in testing anxiety for those without previous experience, although results in this area were mixed. Finally, studies and surveys often indicate an acceptance and preference for linear computer-based testing (CBT) by examinees.
机译:结合肿瘤学护理认证公司(ONCC)对其检查进行计算机化的决定,对文献进行了审查,以确定计算机化纸质铅笔测试方法的比较研究,并确定每种方法的相对优势。数据来源包括通过ERIC,CINAHL和PubMed数据库或通过频繁引用文献确定的期刊文章和新闻通讯功能。大多数研究发现考试成绩与分娩方式无关。确定了计算机化测试的几个优点,包括计划方便,即时评分功能和增强的安全性。一个缺点可能是对那些以前没有经验的人的测试焦虑感有所增加,尽管这方面的结果好坏参半。最后,研究和调查通常表明考生对线性计算机测试(CBT)的接受和偏爱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号