...
首页> 外文期刊>藥學雜誌 >Analysis of clinical factors that influence re-stenosis after percutaneous coronary stenting
【24h】

Analysis of clinical factors that influence re-stenosis after percutaneous coronary stenting

机译:影响经皮冠状动脉支架置入术后再狭窄的临床因素分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Evidence has recently been accumulating that a sirolimus-eluting stent (DES) is superior to a bare-metal stent (BMS) in preventing restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and an increasing number of Japanese hospitals have been adopting DES. We conducted a retrospective study to identify clinical factors that influence the risk of restenosis after PCI, including stent types, by analyzing the data of 49 continuous patients who received PCI and follow-up coronary angiography in Hiratsuka City Hospital between March, 2004 and March, 2005. Age, sex, body mass index, smoking, complications, clinical diagnosis before PCI, the site and number of stenoses, implanted stent type (BMS or DES), the number of stents used, maximum inflating pressure and withdrawal of ticlopidine due to its adverse drug reactions were chosen as potential factors that may influence the risk of restenosis, and the correlation between these factors and restenosis was tested by Student's t-test or chi-square test. Coronary restenosis developed in 10 out of 49 patients, and factors having significant correlation with restenosis were age (73+/-7 in the restenosis group (R) and 64+/-12 in the non-restenosis group (N) (p<0.05)) and the type of stent (DES used in only one of 10 cases in R whereas in 24 of 39 in N (p<0.001)). Multivariate analysis showed older age (odds ratio (OR): 1.200 (95% CI: 1.038-2.823)) and the use of DES are independent predictors for restenosis (OR: 0.015 (95%CI: 0.001-0.249)). Our study further supports the efficacy of DES in PCI, but its long-term outcome is yet to be confirmed.
机译:最近的证据表明,在预防经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后再狭窄方面,西罗莫司洗脱支架(DES)优于裸金属支架(BMS),并且越来越多的日本医院采用DES。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以分析2004年3月至2004年3月之间在平冢市医院进行的49例接受PCI手术并进行了后续冠状动脉造影检查的连续患者的数据,从而确定了影响PCI后再狭窄风险的临床因素,包括支架类型。 2005年。年龄,性别,体重指数,吸烟,并发症,PCI之前的临床诊断,狭窄的部位和数量,植入的支架类型(BMS或DES),使用的支架数量,最大充气压力和因选择其不良药物反应作为可能影响再狭窄风险的潜在因素,并通过Student t检验或卡方检验检验这些因素与再狭窄之间的相关性。 49例患者中有10例发生了冠状动脉再狭窄,与再狭窄有显着相关性的因素是年龄(再狭窄组(R)为73 +/- 7,非再狭窄组(N)为64 +/- 12(p < 0.05))和支架的类型(DES仅在R的10例中使用之一,而在N的39的24中使用(p <0.001))。多变量分析显示年龄较大(优势比(OR):1.200(95%CI:1.038-2.823)),使用DES是再狭窄的独立预测因子(OR:0.015(95%CI:0.001-0.249))。我们的研究进一步支持DES在PCI中的疗效,但其长期结果尚待证实。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号