首页> 外文期刊>Cognition: International Journal of Cognitive Psychology >The influence of intention, outcome and question-wording on children's and adults' moral judgments
【24h】

The influence of intention, outcome and question-wording on children's and adults' moral judgments

机译:意向,结果和疑问词对儿童和成人道德判断的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The influence of intention and outcome information on moral judgments was investigated by telling children aged 4-8 years and adults (N=169) stories involving accidental harms (positive intention, negative outcome) or attempted harms (negative intention, positive outcome) from two studies (Helwig, Zelazo, & Wilson, 2001; Zelazo, Helwig, & Lau, 1996). When the original acceptability (wrongness) question was asked, the original findings were closely replicated: children's and adults' acceptability judgments were based almost exclusively on outcome, and children's punishment judgments were also primarily outcome-based. However, when this question was rephrased, 4-5-year-olds' judgments were approximately equally influenced by intention and outcome, and from 5-6 years they were based considerably more on intention than outcome. These findings indicate that, for methodological reasons, children's (and adults') ability to make intention-based judgment has often been substantially underestimated. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:目的和结果信息对道德判断的影响是通过向4-8岁的儿童和成年人(N = 169)讲两个涉及意外伤害(积极意图,消极结果)或未遂伤害(消极意图,积极结果)的故事来进行调查的研究(Helwig,Zelazo,&Wilson,2001; Zelazo,Helwig,&Lau,1996)。当询问原始的可接受性(错误)问题时,原始发现被严格复制:儿童和成人的可接受性判断几乎完全基于结果,而儿童的惩罚判断也主要基于结果。但是,当改写这个问题时,4-5岁儿童的判断受到意图和结果的影响大致相同,而从5-6岁开始,他们的判断更多地基于意图而不是结果。这些发现表明,由于方法论的原因,儿童(和成年人)做出基于意图的判断的能力常常被大大低估了。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号