...
首页> 外文期刊>癌と化学療法 >Carboplatin plus gemcitabine therapy versus carboplatin plus weekly paclitaxel therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer
【24h】

Carboplatin plus gemcitabine therapy versus carboplatin plus weekly paclitaxel therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

机译:卡铂联合吉西他滨治疗与卡铂联合每周紫杉醇治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We compared two chemotherapy regimens for advanced non small-cell lung cancer. The CG regimen consisted of carboplatin (AUC 4 to 5) on day 1 plus gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)) on day 1 and 8, every three weeks, while the CP regimen was carboplatin (AUC 6) on day 1 plus paclitaxel (70 mg/m(2)) on day 1, 8 and 15, every four weeks. There was a total of 62 patients, 23 on the CG regimen and 39 on the CP regimen. In initial treatment, the response rate, time to progression and median survival time in the CG regimen and CP regimens were 40% vs 22%, 124 days vs 67 days, and 422 days vs 328 days, respectively. There was no statistical difference in the outcome. However, the toxicity profile was different in the two regimens. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were frequent in the CG regimen (61% vs 31%, p=0.02, 44% vs 3%, p=0.0002, respectively). Non hematological toxicity including grade 2 alopecia was less in the CG regimen (4% vs 36%, p=0.012). In choosing the chemotherapeutic regimen for non small cell cancer, it is important to consider the toxicity.
机译:我们比较了晚期非小细胞肺癌的两种化疗方案。 CG方案由第1天的卡铂(AUC 4至5)加上第1天和第8天的吉西他滨(1,000 mg / m(2))每三周组成,而CP方案由第1天的卡铂(AUC 6)加紫杉醇(70 mg / m(2))在第1、8和15天每四周一次。共有62例患者,其中CG方案23例,CP方案39例。在初始治疗中,CG方案和CP方案的缓解率,进展时间和中位生存时间分别为40%比22%,124天比67天和422天比328天。结果无统计学差异。但是,两种方案的毒性特征不同。 CG方案中3/4级中性粒细胞减少和血小板减少症很常见(分别为61%vs 31%,p = 0.02,44%vs 3%,p = 0.0002)。在CG方案中,非血液学毒性(包括2级脱发)较少(4%比36%,p = 0.012)。在选择非小细胞癌的化疗方案时,重要的是要考虑毒性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号