...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes technology & therapeutics >The minimal model of glucose disposal in the analysis of glucose effectiveness: importance of early insulin data.
【24h】

The minimal model of glucose disposal in the analysis of glucose effectiveness: importance of early insulin data.

机译:分析葡萄糖有效性的最小葡萄糖处置模型:早期胰岛素数据的重要性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Glucose effectiveness (S(g)) is an important component in glucose tolerance. Values of S(g) using "open loop" glucose kinetic computer programs are usually higher compared to closed loop method (CLM) programs that incorporate insulin secretion modeling. We aimed to test whether these differences are caused by (1) inclusion of insulin secretion modeling or (2) the method of representing plasma insulin values in the first few minutes of the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGT). METHODS: FSIGTs without insulin supplementation were performed in six healthy volunteers, and the Bergman minimal model was fitted to the data using the simulation and modeling program SAAM. RESULTS: The CLM, which represents the insulin data in the first few minutes by a best-fit curve extrapolated to the y-axis, yielded a significantly lower S(g) than the approach similar to the computer program MINMOD, where the first few minutes of insulin data are represented by a line joining the basal to the peak values (1.55 +/- 0.28 vs. 1.97 +/- 0.27 [SE] x 10(-2)/min, P < 0.05). This second analysis was then repeated while forcing the program to represent the insulin data after the insulin peak in the same way as in the CLM, obtaining an almost identical result for S(g) (1.99 +/- 0.29). Insulin sensitivity was not significantly affected. CONCLUSIONS: The higher S(g) estimates are caused by the method of representing the first few minutes of insulin data rather than by the incorporation of insulin secretion modeling. It is, therefore, important to know how the early insulin data are represented when comparing results from different computer modeling programs.
机译:背景:葡萄糖有效性(S(g))是葡萄糖耐量的重要组成部分。与结合胰岛素分泌模型的闭环方法(CLM)程序相比,使用“开环”葡萄糖动力学计算机程序的S(g)值通常更高。我们旨在测试这些差异是由(1)包括胰岛素分泌模型或(2)在频繁采样的静脉葡萄糖耐量测试(FSIGT)的前几分钟表示血浆胰岛素值的方法引起的。方法:在六名健康志愿者中进行了不添加胰岛素的FSIGT,并使用模拟和建模程序SAAM将Bergman最小模型拟合到数据中。结果:CLM代表了最初几分钟内胰岛素数据,该曲线通过外推到y轴的最佳拟合曲线得出,其S(g)显着低于类似于计算机程序MINMOD的方法(其中前几个胰岛素数据的分钟数以一条连接基线和峰值的线表示(1.55 +/- 0.28对1.97 +/- 0.27 [SE] x 10(-2)/ min,P <0.05)。然后重复此第二次分析,同时以与CLM中相同的方式强制程序在胰岛素峰值后代表胰岛素数据,从而获得几乎相同的S(g)结果(1.99 +/- 0.29)。胰岛素敏感性未受到明显影响。结论:较高的S(g)估计值是由表示胰岛素数据的前几分钟的方法引起的,而不是由合并胰岛素分泌模型引起的。因此,重要的是要知道在比较不同计算机建模程序的结果时早期胰岛素数据是如何表示的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号