...
首页> 外文期刊>Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental >Evaluation of insulin sensitivity and glucose effectiveness during a standardized breakfast test: comparison with the minimal model analysis of an intravenous glucose tolerance test.
【24h】

Evaluation of insulin sensitivity and glucose effectiveness during a standardized breakfast test: comparison with the minimal model analysis of an intravenous glucose tolerance test.

机译:在标准早餐试验中评估胰岛素敏感性和葡萄糖有效性:与静脉糖耐量试验的最小模型分析进行比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is a need for reliable measurements of insulin sensitivity (SI) simpler than the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp or the intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT), which could be used when the simpler surrogates based on fasting insulin (Ib) and glucose (Gb) lose their validity. Several evaluations of SI derived from oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) or its physiologic form, the standardized breakfast test (SBT), have been proposed. We aimed at determining which SBT-derived measurements of SI give the best prediction of the values obtained with the minimal model analysis of an IVGTT. Twenty-eight subjects (23 females and 5 males; age, 44.3+/-0.6 years) with a wide range of glucose tolerance randomly underwent a hyperglucidic SBT and an IVGTT with minimal model analysis. Correlations of 35 indices (converted if appropriated into similar units) with IVGTT-derived SI were calculated, and the accuracy of the empiric formulas obtained with the 11 best predictions were evaluated with Bland-Altman plots. Subjects covered all the spectrum of SI between 0.19 and 21.3 min-1/(microU.mL-1)x10(-4). Eight procedures yielded satisfactory predictions of minimal model SI: (1) SI (from Matsuda's composite index)=-1.24+65/(IbGbImGm)-0.5; (2) SI=1.89+2690/(IbGbImGm); (3) SI (from Bennett's index)=-2.93+5.16/(log Ibxlog Gb); (4) SI (from Sluiter's index)=0.2+2400/(IpGp); (5) SI=-8.54+38.4/(Belfiore's ISI index); (6) SI (from Cederholm's formula)=76/(Gm log Im); (7) SI=0.248+0.947/GbIm; (8) SI (from Mari's "oral glucose insulin sensitivity" index)=oral glucose insulin sensitivity/Ip; (9) Caumo's model. Glucose effectiveness Sg can also be accurately predicted by the following formula: Sg=2.921e-0.185(G60- Gb) (Ip=insulin peak; Gp=glucose peak; Ia=insulin area; Ga=glucose area; G60=glycemia at 60 minutes). The hyperglucidic SBT can provide accurate evaluations of SI and Sg, either by elaborated models or by simple empiric formulas.
机译:需要一种比正常血糖高胰岛素钳夹法或静脉葡萄糖耐量试验(IVGTT)更简单的可靠的胰岛素敏感性(SI)测量方法,当基于空腹胰岛素(Ib)和葡萄糖(Gb)的更简单替代指标丢失时,可以使用这些方法其有效性。有人提出了对口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)或其生理形式标准化早餐试验(SBT)得出的SI的几种评估方法。我们旨在确定哪些SBT衍生的SI测量值可以通过IVGTT的最小模型分析获得最佳预测值。 28名患有广泛葡萄糖耐量的受试者(23名女性和5名男性;年龄44.3 +/- 0.6岁)随机接受了高血糖SBT和IVGTT,且模型分析最少。计算了35个指标与IVGTT衍生的SI的相关性(如果适用,换算成相似的单位),并用Bland-Altman图评估了用11个最佳预测获得的经验公式的准确性。受试者覆盖了0.19至21.3 min-1 /(microU.mL-1)x10(-4)之间的所有SI光谱。八个程序产生了最小模型SI的令人满意的预测:(1)SI(根据Matsuda的综合指数)=-1.24 + 65 /(IbGbImGm)-0.5; (2)SI = 1.89 + 2690 /(IbGbImGm); (3)SI(根据Bennett指数)=-2.93 + 5.16 /(log Ibxlog Gb); (4)SI(根据Sluiter指数)= 0.2 + 2400 /(IpGp); (5)SI = -8.54 + 38.4 /(Belfiore的ISI指数); (6)SI(根据Cederholm公式)= 76 /(Gm log Im); (7)SI = 0.248 + 0.947 / GbIm; (8)SI(根据Mari的“口服葡萄糖胰岛素敏感性”指数)=口服葡萄糖胰岛素敏感性/ Ip; (9)卡莫模型。葡萄糖有效性Sg也可以通过以下公式准确预测:Sg = 2.921e-0.185(G60-Gb)(Ip =胰岛素峰; Gp =葡萄糖峰; Ia =胰岛素面积; Ga =葡萄糖面积; G60 = 60岁时的血糖分钟)。高血糖SBT可以通过精细的模型或简单的经验公式来提供对SI和Sg的准确评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号