...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of general internal medicine >Learning oral presentation skills: a rhetorical analysis with pedagogical and professional implications.
【24h】

Learning oral presentation skills: a rhetorical analysis with pedagogical and professional implications.

机译:学习口头表达能力:修辞分析,具有教学和专业意义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Oral presentation skills are central to physician-physician communication; however, little is known about how these skills are learned. Rhetoric is a social science which studies communication in terms of context and explores the action of language on knowledge, attitudes, and values. It has not previously been applied to medical discourse. We used rhetorical principles to qualitatively study how students learn oral presentation skills and what professional values are communicated in this process. DESIGN: Descriptive study. SETTING: Inpatient general medicine service in a university-affiliated public hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve third-year medical students during their internal medicine clerkship and 14 teachers. MEASUREMENTS: One-hundred sixty hours of ethnographic observation. including 73 oral presentations on rounds. Discoursed-based interviews of 8 students and 10 teachers. Data were qualitatively analyzed to uncover recurrent patterns of communication. MAIN RESULTS: Students and teachers had different perceptions of the purpose of oral presentation, and this was reflected in performance. Students described and conducted the presentation as a rule-based, data-storage activity governed by "order" and "structure." Teachers approached the presentation as a flexible means of "communication" and a method for "constructing" the details of a case into a diagnostic or therapeutic plan. Although most teachers viewed oral presentations rhetorically (sensitive to context), most feedback that students received was implicit and acontextual, with little guidance provided for determining relevant content. This led to dysfunctional generalizations by students, sometimes resulting in worse communication skills (e.g., comment "be brief" resulted in reading faster rather than editing) and unintended value acquisition (e.g., request for less social history interpreted as social history never relevant). CONCLUSIONS: Students learn oral presentation by trial and error rather than through teaching of an explicit rhetorical model. This may delay development of effective communication skills and result in acquisition of unintended professional values. Teaching and learning of oral presentation skills may be improved by emphasizing that context determines content and by making explicit the tacit rules of presentation.
机译:目的:口头表达能力是医师与医师沟通的核心;但是,关于如何学习这些技能知之甚少。修辞学是一门社会科学,它根据上下文研究交流,并探讨语言对知识,态度和价值观的作用。它以前尚未应用于医学话语。我们使用修辞学原理定性研究了学生如何学习口头表达技能以及在此过程中传达了哪些专业价值观。设计:描述性研究。地点:大学附属公立医院的住院普通药物服务。参加者:十二名三年级医学生在其内部医学业务中以及14名老师。测量:一百六十小时的民族志观察。包括73轮的口头报告。基于话语的8名学生和10名老师的访谈。对数据进行定性分析,以发现经常性的交流方式。主要结果:学生和老师对口头陈述的目的有不同的理解,这反映在表现上。学生将演示文稿描述为以规则为基础的数据存储活动,并受“顺序”和“结构”支配。教师将演示文稿作为灵活的“交流”手段和一种将病例的细节“构建”为诊断或治疗计划的方法。尽管大多数老师都用口头表达(对上下文敏感)来观看口头报告,但学生收到的大多数反馈是含蓄的和上下文相关的,很少提供有关确定相关内容的指导。这导致学生的功能泛化功能失调,有时会导致交流技巧变差(例如,评论“简短”会导致阅读速度快于编辑)和意想不到的价值获取(例如,要求少一些社会历史的请求被解释为从未相关的社会历史)。结论:学生通过反复试验而不是通过明确的修辞模型教学来学习口头表达。这可能会延迟有效沟通技巧的发展,并导致获得意想不到的专业价值观。口头表达技巧的教学和学习可以通过强调上下文决定内容并明确表达默认的表达规则而得到改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号