...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research >Transverse coronoid fracture: When does it have to be fixed?
【24h】

Transverse coronoid fracture: When does it have to be fixed?

机译:冠状横突骨折:什么时候必须固定?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: After elbow fracture-dislocation, surgeons confront numerous treatment options in pursuing a stable joint for early motion. The relative contributions of the radial head and coronoid, in combination, to elbow stability have not been defined fully. Questions/purposes: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of an approximately 50% transverse coronoid fracture and fixation in the setting of an intact or resected radial head on coronal (varus/valgus) and axial (internal and external rotational) laxity in (1) gravity varus stress; and (2) gravity valgus stress models. Methods: Kinematic data were collected on six fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities tested with passive motion throughout the flexion arc under varus and valgus gravity stress with lateral collateral ligaments reconstructed. Testing included coronoid fracture and osteosynthesis with and without a radial head. Results: In the varus gravity stress model, fixation of the coronoid improved varus stability (fixed: 1.6?[95% confidence interval, 1.0-2.2], fractured: 5.6?[4.2-7.0], p < 0.001) and internal rotational stability (fixed: 1.8?[0.9-2.7], fractured: 5.4?[4.0-6.8], p < 0.001), but radial head fixation did not contribute to varus stability (intact head: 2.7?[1.3-4.1], resected head: 3.8?[2.3-5.3], p = 0.4) or rotational stability (intact: 2.7?[0.9-4.5], resected head: 3.9?[1.5-6.3], p = 0.4). With valgus stress, coronoid fixation improved valgus stability (fixed: 2.1?[1.0-3.1], fractured: 3.8?[1.8-5.8], p < 0.04) and external rotation stability (fixed: 0.8?[0.1-1.5], fractured: 2.1?[0.9-3.4], p < 0.04), but the radial head played a more important role in providing valgus stability (intact: 1.4?[0.8-2.0], resected head: 7.1?[3.5-10.7], p < 0.001). Conclusions: Fixation of a 50% transverse coronoid fracture improves varus and internal rotatory laxity but is unlikely to meaningfully improve valgus or external rotation laxity. The radial head, on the other hand, is a stabilizer to resist valgus stress regardless of the status of the coronoid. Clinical Relevance: Determination as to whether it is necessary to fix a coronoid fracture should be based on the stability of the elbow when tested with a varus load. The elbow may potentially be stable with fractures involving less than 50% of the coronoid. Under all circumstances, the radial head should be fixed or replaced to ensure valgus external rotatory stability.
机译:背景:肘部骨折脱位后,外科医生在寻求稳定的关节进行早期运动时面临众多治疗选择。 fully骨头和冠状动脉结合在一起对肘关节稳定性的相对作用尚未完全确定。问题/目的:本研究的目的是评估在冠状动脉(内翻/外翻)和轴向(内,外旋转)松弛度完整或切除的radial骨头的情况下,约50%的横向冠状动脉骨折和固定的效果(1)重力内应力; (2)重力外翻应力模型。方法:收集6个新鲜冷冻的尸体上肢的运动学数据,在内翻和外翻重力作用下重建侧副韧带,在整个屈曲弧内进行被动运动测试。测试包括冠状动脉骨折和有或没有a骨头的骨合成。结果:在内翻重力应力模型中,固定冠状突改善了内翻稳定性(固定:1.6?[95%置信区间,1.0-2.2],断裂:5.6?[4.2-7.0],p <0.001)和内部旋转稳定性(固定:1.8?[0.9-2.7],骨折:5.4?[4.0-6.8],p <0.001),但radial骨头固定对内翻稳定性无贡献(完整头:2.7?[1.3-4.1],切除头) :3.8≤[2.3-5.3],p = 0.4)或旋转稳定性(完整:2.7≤[0.9-4.5],切除头:3.9≤[1.5-6.3],p = 0.4)。在外翻应力作用下,冠状动脉固定改善了外翻稳定性(固定:2.1?[1.0-3.1],骨折:3.8?[1.8-5.8],p <0.04)和外旋稳定性(固定:0.8?[0.1-1.5],骨折) :2.1?[0.9-3.4],p <0.04),但head骨头在提供外翻稳定性方面起着更重要的作用(完整:1.4?[0.8-2.0],切除头:7.1?[3.5-10.7],p <0.001)。结论:固定50%的冠状横向横断骨折可改善内翻和内旋松弛度,但不太可能显着改善外翻或外旋松弛度。另一方面,radial骨头是抵抗外翻应力的稳定器,而与冠冕的状态无关。临床意义:确定是否有必要修复冠突骨折时,应以内翻负荷试验时肘的稳定性为基础。肘部骨折少于50%的冠状动脉可能稳定。在任何情况下,都应固定或更换the骨头,以确保外翻的外部旋转稳定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号