...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research >No difference in postoperative pain after arthroscopic versus open rotator cuff repair
【24h】

No difference in postoperative pain after arthroscopic versus open rotator cuff repair

机译:关节镜与开放式肩袖修复后的术后疼痛无差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Rotator cuff repair is a successful treatment in terms of patient satisfaction and pain relief regardless of the repair method. Although arthroscopic repair is commonly thought to be less painful than open or miniopen repair, studies disagree on this point. Questions/purposes: We wished to compare the results of patient-reported postoperative pain after open versus arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and to identify any predictors of various pain outcomes in these groups. Methods: One-hundred two patients (52 with open repair, 50 with arthroscopic repair) participated. Preoperatively, patients reported pain levels and self-perceived pain tolerance, and they underwent a test for an objective measurement of pain tolerance. Intraoperative variables included surgery duration and size of the tear. Postoperatively, patients maintained a pain log for 6 weeks, reporting daily pain (VAS) and narcotic consumption. Outcome variables included days to zero pain, the presence of residual pain, weekly pain levels, and cumulative 6-week pain level. Age, sex, tear size, pain tolerance, surgery duration, and self-reported preoperative pain were analyzed as possible predictors of postoperative pain. This study was powered (β = 0.2 and α = 0.05) to detect a difference of 10% in the VAS and postoperative analgesic use with a requirement of 50 patients in each arm. Results: Days to zero pain (mean, 28.8 days, 95% CI, 24.8-32.8 days versus 27.6 days, 95% CI, 23.3-31.9 days for open versus arthroscopic, respectively; p = 0.69) were not different between the open and arthroscopic repair groups. There were differences of questionable clinical relevance and borderline statistical significance favoring arthroscopic intervention in the second postoperative week (2.3 versus 3.2 of 10 on the VAS; p = 0.045). Otherwise, no differences were seen between the two groups in terms of residual pain, cumulative pain, or medication use. Consistent predictors of postoperative pain affecting multiple outcome measures included severe preoperative pain, smaller tear size, and female sex. Conclusions: There were no differences of clinically relevant size between arthroscopic and open rotator cuff surgery in this comparative series. Therefore, the choice of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair should not be based on decreased postoperative pain. Level of Evidence: Level II, therapeutic study. See the Instructions or Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
机译:背景:无论采用哪种修复方法,肩袖修复术都是可以使患者满意并缓解疼痛的成功疗法。尽管通常认为关节镜修补术比开放式或微型开放式手术的痛苦要小,但在这一点上研究却意见分歧。问题/目的:我们希望比较开放式和关节镜式肩袖修复术后患者报告的术后疼痛结果,并确定这些组中各种疼痛结果的任何预测因素。方法:一百零二例患者(开放修补术52例,关节镜修补术50例)参加了研究。术前,患者报告了疼痛水平和自我感知的疼痛耐受性,他们接受了一项客观测量疼痛耐受性的测试。术中变量包括手术持续时间和眼泪大小。术后,患者维持6周的疼痛记录,报告每日疼痛(VAS)和麻醉剂消耗。结果变量包括零疼痛的天数,残余疼痛的存在,每周的疼痛程度和累积的6周疼痛程度。分析了年龄,性别,眼泪大小,疼痛耐受性,手术时间和自我报告的术前疼痛,将其作为术后疼痛的可能预测指标。这项研究的功效(β= 0.2和α= 0.05)能够检测出VAS和术后镇痛使用之间的差异为10%,每组需要50名患者。结果:开放式和关节镜下零痛的天数(分别为28.8天,95%CI,24.8-32.8天和27.6天,95%CI,23.3-31.9天; p = 0.69)在开放和手术之间无差异。关节镜修复组。术后第二周有偏倚的临床相关性和边缘统计显着性的差异,有利于关节镜介入治疗(VAS分别为2.3比10中的3.2; p = 0.045)。否则,两组在残余疼痛,累积性疼痛或药物使用方面均无差异。影响多种结果的术后疼痛的一致预测因素包括严重的术前疼痛,较小的眼泪大小和女性。结论:在这个比较系列中,关节镜和开放式肩袖手术的临床相关大小没有差异。因此,关节镜下肩袖修复的选择不应基于术后疼痛的减轻。证据级别:II级,治疗研究。有关证据级别的完整说明,请参见说明或作者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号