首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR >Catheter-based intraaccess blood flow measurement as a problem-solving tool in hemodialysis access intervention
【24h】

Catheter-based intraaccess blood flow measurement as a problem-solving tool in hemodialysis access intervention

机译:基于导管的通路内血流量测量作为血液透析通路干预中的问题解决工具

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To investigate retrospectively the use of catheter-based intraaccess blood flow measurements as an adjunct to physical examination and fistulography in hemodialysis access interventions. Materials and Methods: Among 1,540 dialysis interventions performed at a single institution in a 2.5-year period, 104 qualifying catheter-based flow measurements were made in 70 mature native fistula interventions in 55 patients and 34 graft interventions in 31 patients. The flow rate threshold prompting intervention was generally 600 mL/min, but some variation existed depending on the clinical setting. Results: The most common indication for measurement of blood flow was to determine the hemodynamic significance of a fistula inflow stenosis (n = 25), of which only four had subsequent intervention. Other common indications included decision-making resulting in further angioplasty or stent implantation of noninflow lesions (fistulas, n = 10; grafts, n = 23) versus termination of the procedure (n = 23), problem-solving in cases in which there was no visible lesion to explain the clinical indicator of access failure (n = 17), evaluation for high-flow-related cardiac risk in aneurysmal fistulas (n = 13), suboptimal evaluation of the inflow (n = 8), and suboptimal physical examination (n = 6). Overall, flow measurements supported a decision to perform angioplasty (n = 11) or stent placement (n = 3) in 17% of fistula interventions and 35% of graft interventions. Conclusions: The major benefit of flow measurement was to support a decision to withhold further angioplasty or stent placement.
机译:目的:回顾性研究基于导管的通路内血流测量在血液透析通路干预中作为身体检查和瘘管造影术的辅助手段的用途。材料和方法:在一个为期2.5年的单一机构中进行的1,540例透析干预中,对55例患者的70例成熟天然瘘管干预措施和31例患者的34例移植物干预措施进行了104项基于导管的合格流量测量。提示进行干预的流速阈值通常为600 mL / min,但根据临床情况存在一些差异。结果:测量血流的最常见指征是确定瘘管狭窄的血液动力学意义(n = 25),其中只有四个随后进行了干预。其他常见的适应症包括做出决定,从而进一步进行血管成形术或支架植入非流入性病变(瘘管,n = 10;移植物,n = 23)与终止手术(n = 23)相比,在存在这种情况的情况下解决问题无可见病灶可解释出入失败的临床指标(n = 17),动脉瘤性瘘管中与高流量相关的心脏病风险评估(n = 13),对入流的评估不理想(n = 8)和对体检不理想(n = 6)。总体而言,流量测量结果支持在17%的瘘管干预措施和35%的移植物干预措施中进行血管成形术(n = 11)或支架置入(n = 3)的决定。结论:流量测量的主要好处是支持决定不再进行血管成形术或支架置入。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号