首页> 外文期刊>Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis >CHA2DS2-VASc versus CHADS2 for stroke risk assessment in low-risk patients with atrial fibrillation: A pilot study from a single center of the NCDR-PINNACLE registry
【24h】

CHA2DS2-VASc versus CHADS2 for stroke risk assessment in low-risk patients with atrial fibrillation: A pilot study from a single center of the NCDR-PINNACLE registry

机译:CHA2DS2-VASc和CHADS2在低风险房颤患者中风风险评估中的应用:来自NCDR-PINNACLE注册中心的一个中心的初步研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The CHADS2 score is widely used to assess the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Patients with score of 0 and 1 are considered 'low risk' and are often treated with aspirin. In a Danish Study, the CHA2DS2-VASc score was shown to identify low and high-risk subgroups among patients with CHADS2 score of 0 and 1, with annual risk ranging from 0.84 to 8.18 %. This study seeks to assess whether using CHA2DS2-VASc score will identify high-risk subset of patients with low CHADS2 scores in an American population. This pilot study examined data from our cardiology fellowship ambulatory clinics from January 2009 to May 2012 using the NCDR-PINNACLE registry. Each cardiology fellow entered patients' data using on-line software developed by the American College of Cardiology. Among 2,048 patients followed at our clinics, 478 had AF. Of those, 161 patients had CHADS2 score of 0 (44 patients) or 1 (117 patients). Calculating the CHA2DS2-VASc score in these patients, 12 (7.4 %) had score of 0, 50 (31.1 %) had score of 1, 66(41 %) had score of 2, 31 (19.3 %) had score of 3 and 2 (1.2 %) had score of 4. Using original CHADS2 recommendation, warfarin would not be strongly recommended in any of these patients. Utilizing the CHA2DS 2-VASc score, 61.5 % of the 161 patients would have a score of 2 or more signifying increased risk where anticoagulation may be indicated. Compared to CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc may more precisely predict the risk of stroke and anticoagulation strategy in low-risk patients with non-valvular AF.
机译:CHADS2分数被广泛用于评估房颤(AF)患者中风的风险。得分为0和1的患者被认为是“低危”患者,经常接受阿司匹林治疗。在丹麦的一项研究中,CHA2DS2-VASc分数显示可识别CHADS2分数为0和1的患者中的低风险和高风险亚组,年风险范围为0.84至8.18%。这项研究旨在评估使用CHA2DS2-VASc评分是否可以识别美国人群中CHADS2评分低的高危患者。这项前瞻性研究使用NCDR-PINNACLE注册中心检查了我们的心脏病学研究中心门诊诊所从2009年1月至2012年5月的数据。每个心脏病专家都使用由美国心脏病学会开发的在线软件输入患者的数据。在我们诊所的2,048位患者中,有478位患有房颤。其中,161例患者的CHADS2评分为0(44例)或1(117例)。计算这些患者的CHA2DS2-VASc分数,其中12(7.4%)的得分为0,50(31.1%)的得分为1,66(41%)的得分为2,31(19.3%)的得分为3, 2(1.2%)的得分为4。使用原始CHADS2推荐,在所有这些患者中均不强烈推荐使用华法林。使用CHA2DS 2-VASc评分,在161名患者中,有61.5%的评分为2分或更高,表明可能需要抗凝治疗的风险增加。与CHADS2相比,CHA2DS2-VASc可以更准确地预测非瓣膜性房颤低危患者的中风风险和抗凝策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号