首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Dietetic Association >Acceptance of two US Department of Agriculture commodity whole-grain products: a school-based study in Texas and Minnesota.
【24h】

Acceptance of two US Department of Agriculture commodity whole-grain products: a school-based study in Texas and Minnesota.

机译:接受两种美国农业部商品全谷物产品:在德克萨斯州和明尼苏达州的一项基于学校的研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Whole-grain intake among children and adolescents is below national recommendations, prompting efforts to increase intake in schools. The purpose of this study was to compare the acceptance of whole-grain pancakes and tortillas to refined grain counterparts when served as part of the school meal. Data were collected at 10 schools in Minnesota and seven schools in Texas during the Spring and Fall semesters of 2009. Three pancake and two tortilla products of varying red or white whole-wheat flour content were each served an average of four times per school. Aggregate plate waste was collected and percent consumption used to assess acceptance. Students rated each product on overall liking, taste, color, and softness on 5-point (elementary schools) or 9-point hedonic scales (middle and high schools). Analysis of covariance was used to compare intake and rating scores of all products. For all children, intake of whole-grain products was substantial (percent consumption ranging from 67% to 75%). No differences were noted in consumption of whole-wheat pancakes compared to refined wheat pancakes, while consumption of whole-wheat tortillas was lower than refined products. In elementary schools, overall liking scores of pancakes made with red whole-wheat and both types of whole-wheat tortillas were lower than refined products. However, in middle and high schools, overall liking scores of 100% red whole-wheat pancakes and 66% white whole-wheat tortillas were similar to refined products. Substituting refined grain with whole-grain options represents a viable approach to increasing consumption of whole-grain products in schools.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2011.06.003
机译:儿童和青少年的全麦摄入量低于国家建议,促使人们努力增加学校的摄入量。这项研究的目的是比较全谷物煎饼和玉米饼与精制谷物作为学校餐食时的接受程度。在2009年春季和秋季学期期间,在明尼苏达州的10所学校和德克萨斯州的7所学校收集了数据。每种学校平均为三份煎饼和两种玉米饼产品(红色或白色全麦面粉含量各不相同)平均提供四次。收集了总的板废料,并使用了消耗百分比来评估可接受性。学生在5点(小学)或9点享乐量表(初中和高中)上对每种产品的总体喜好,口味,颜色和柔软度进行评分。协方差分析用于比较所有产品的摄入量和等级评分。对于所有儿童而言,全谷物产品的摄入量很高(消费百分比从67%到75%不等)。与精制小麦煎饼相比,全麦煎饼的消费量没有差异,而全麦玉米饼的消费量低于精制产品。在小学,用红色全麦和两种全麦玉米饼制成的煎饼的总体喜欢评分均低于精制产品。但是,在中学和高中,100%红色全麦薄煎饼和66%白色全麦玉米饼的总体喜欢评分与精制产品相似。用全谷物选项替代精制谷物代表了增加学校全谷物产品消费的一种可行方法。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2011.06.003

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号