首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Cardiology >Differences in inducibility and prognosis of in-hospital versus out-of-hospital identified nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary artery disease: clinical and trial design implications.
【24h】

Differences in inducibility and prognosis of in-hospital versus out-of-hospital identified nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary artery disease: clinical and trial design implications.

机译:冠心病患者院内和院外发现的非持续性室性心动过速的可诱导性和预后差异:临床和试验设计意义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to describe the influence of the clinical setting (in-hospital vs. out-of-hospital) in which nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) is discovered on the rate of inducibility of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), arrhythmic events and survival in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. BACKGROUND: In-hospital presentation of sustained VT is independently associated with lower long-term overall survival. The impact of the clinical setting in which NSVT is documented is unknown. METHODS: In the Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial (MUSTT), designed to assess the benefit of randomized antiarrhythmic therapy guided by electrophysiologic testing in patients with asymptomatic NSVT, CAD and LV dysfunction, eligible patients were enrolled irrespective of the setting in which the index arrhythmia was discovered. In this retrospective analysis, we compared the rate of VT inducibility and outcome of MUSTT-enrolled patients with in-hospital versus out-of-hospital presentation of NSVT. RESULTS: Monomorphic sustained VT was induced in 35% and 28% of the patients whose index NSVT occurred in-hospital and out-of-hospital, respectively (adjusted p = 0.006). Cardiac arrest or death due to arrhythmia at two- and five-year follow-ups were 14% and 28% for untreated patients with in-hospital-identified NSVT and 11% and 21% for the out-of-hospital group (adjusted p = 0.10). Overall mortality rates at two- and five-year follow-ups were 24% and 48% for inpatients and 18% and 38% for outpatients (adjusted p = 0.018). In patients randomized to antiarrhythmic therapy, there was no significant interaction between patient status (in-hospital vs. out-of-hospital) and treatment impact on the rates of total mortality (p = 0.98) and arrhythmic events (p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CAD and impaired LV function, asymptomatic NSVT identified in-hospital, compared with that identified out-of-hospital, is associated with a higher rate of induction of sustained VT and overall mortality. Therefore, in similar patients, the clinical setting in which NSVT is discovered should be taken into account when formulating patient risk, treatment and clinical trial design.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是描述发现非持续性室性心动过速(NSVT)的临床环境(医院内与院外)对持续性室性心动过速(VT)的诱导率的影响。 ,冠心病(CAD)和左心室(LV)功能障碍的患者的心律失常事件和生存率。背景:持续性室速的院内表现与较低的长期总体生存率独立相关。记录NSVT的临床环境的影响尚不清楚。方法:在多中心非持续性心动过速试验(MUSTT)中,该试验旨在评估无症状NSVT,CAD和LV功能障碍的无症状心律失常,CAD和LV功能不全患者的电生理检查指导的随机抗心律失常治疗的益处,无论是否符合指数性心律不齐的设置发现。在这项回顾性分析中,我们比较了门诊和院外NSVT的MUSTT入组患者的VT诱发率和结局。结果:分别在医院内和院外出现NSVT指数的患者中,分别有35%和28%的患者诱发了单形持​​续性室速(校正后p = 0.006)。院内识别为NSVT的未经治疗的患者在两年和五年随访中因心律失常而导致的心脏骤停或死亡分别为14%和28%,院外组为11%和21%(调整后p = 0.10)。住院两年和五年随访的总死亡率分别为24%和48%,门诊患者为18%和38%(调整后的p = 0.018)。在随机接受抗心律失常治疗的患者中,患者状态(医院内与医院外)与治疗对总死亡率(p = 0.98)和心律不齐事件(p = 0.08)的影响之间没有显着的相互作用。结论:在CAD和左室功能受损的患者中,与在院外鉴别出的无症状NSVT相比,在院内鉴别出的NSVT与持续性VT诱发率和总死亡率更高。因此,在类似的患者中,制定患者风险,治疗和临床试验设计时应考虑发现NSVT的临床环境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号