...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical colorectal cancer >Patients with locally advanced and metastatic colorectal cancer treated with capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil as monotherapy or combination therapy with oxaliplatin: a cost comparison.
【24h】

Patients with locally advanced and metastatic colorectal cancer treated with capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil as monotherapy or combination therapy with oxaliplatin: a cost comparison.

机译:卡培他滨与5-氟尿嘧啶作为单药治疗或与奥沙利铂联合治疗的局部晚期和转移性结直肠癌患者:成本比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

INTRODUCTION: This study quantified the costs associated with the acquisition of chemotherapy, its administration, and the management of chemotherapy-related complications, and their effect on total patient expenditures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced and metastatic colorectal cancer treated with capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) as monotherapy or combination therapy with oxaliplatin from 2003-2006 were identified in the Thomson Reuters MarketScan(R) databases. Selection bias between treatment groups was addressed by propensity score matching, assessment of the risk of complications using Cox models, and an estimate of expenditures using general linear models. RESULTS: In respect to monotherapy, capecitabine users (n = 1272) were propensity score matched to 5-FU/LV users on a 1:1 ratio. The adjusted mean monthly cost was significantly lower for patients treated with capecitabine versus 5-FU/LV (Dollars 6683 vs. Dollars 9304, respectively; P < .0001). Although the cost of drug acquisition was significantly higher for capecitabine than for 5-FU/LV (unadjusted P < .0001), significantly lower costs of capecitabine administration (unadjusted P < .0001) and management of complications (adjusted costs, P < .0001) offset the difference, and drove a lower overall cost. In regard to combination therapy, capecitabine/oxaliplatin users (n = 263) were propensity score matched to 5-FU/LV/oxaliplatin users (n = 526) on a 1:2 ratio. The adjusted mean monthly cost was significantly lower for capecitabine/oxaliplatin than for 5-FU/LV/oxaliplatin (Dollars 11,436 vs. Dollars 14,320, respectively; P < .0001). The cost difference was driven by the significantly lower administration costs of capecitabine-based chemotherapy (unadjusted P < .0001) and management of complications (adjusted P < .0001). CONCLUSION: The monthly cost per patient during capecitabine or capecitabine/oxaliplatin treatment is significantly lower than during 5-FU/LV or 5-FU/LV/oxaliplatin treatment because of lower costs for the administration of chemotherapy and for the management of complications.
机译:引言:本研究量化了与化学疗法的获得,其管理以及与化学疗法相关的并发症的管理相关的成本,以及它们对患者总支出的影响。病人和方法:在汤姆森路透社MarketScan数据库中确定了2003-2006年用卡培他滨或5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙(5-FU / LV)作为单一疗法或与奥沙利铂联合疗法治疗的局部晚期和转移性结直肠癌患者。 。治疗组之间的选择偏差通过倾向得分匹配,使用Cox模型评估并发症风险以及使用一般线性模型估算支出来解决。结果:就单药治疗而言,卡培他滨使用者(n = 1272)的倾向得分与5-FU / LV使用者的比例为1:1。卡培他滨治疗的患者的调整后平均每月费用明显低于5-FU / LV(分别为6683美元和9304美元; P <.0001)。尽管卡培他滨的购药成本明显高于5-FU / LV(未经调整的P <.0001),但是卡培他滨的给药(未经调整的P <.0001)和并发症的管理(经调整的成本,P <。 0001)抵消了差额,并降低了总体成本。关于联合治疗,卡培他滨/奥沙利铂使用者(n = 263)的倾向得分与5-FU / LV /奥沙利铂使用者(n = 526)以1:2的比例相匹配。调整后的卡培他滨/奥沙利铂的平均每月费用明显低于5-FU / LV /奥沙利铂(美元分别为11,436对美元14,320; P <.0001)。成本差异是由以卡培他滨为基础的化疗(未调整P <.0001)和并发症管理(已调整P <.0001)的显着降低所致。结论:卡培他滨或卡培他滨/奥沙利铂治疗期间每个患者的每月费用明显低于5-FU / LV或5-FU / LV /奥沙利铂治疗期间的费用,因为化疗和并发症的管理费用较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号