...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of sports sciences. >Time-motion, tactical and technical analysis in top-level karatekas according to gender, match outcome and weight categories
【24h】

Time-motion, tactical and technical analysis in top-level karatekas according to gender, match outcome and weight categories

机译:根据性别,比赛结果和体重类别对顶级空手道运动员进行时间,战术和技术分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The aim of this study was to define the time-motion (i.e., fighting, preparatory and breaking activity), technical (i.e., attack, timed-attack, counterattack, blocking and grasps) and tactical (i.e., upper limb, lower-limb, combination and throwing) profiles of the senior top-level karate competition played under the most recent rules of the International Karate Federation in relation to gender, match outcome and weight categories. Time-motion, tactical actions and technical executions were investigated of senior karatekas (n=60) during the Karate World Championship. The referee's decisions caused an overall activity-to-break ratio of ~1:1.5 with a significant difference (P=0.025) between karateka's weight categories (light=1:1.5; middle=1:2 and heavy=1:1). High-intensity actions (i.e., attack and defensive actions performed quickly and powerfully) were higher in male compared to female athletes. Top-level karatekas used upper limb techniques more than lower limb ones, with both applied in the head more than in the body. For the high-intensity-actions to pause ratio and the percentage of combined techniques, light weight category was significantly higher than middle weight category. These findings suggest that training programs may need to be specific to the requirements of the gender and weight categories.
机译:这项研究的目的是定义时间运动(即战斗,准备和突破活动),技术性(即进攻,定时进攻,反击,阻挡和抓握)和战术性(即上肢,下肢) ,组合和投掷)根据国际空手道联盟的最新规则进行的高级空手道比赛的性别,比赛结果和体重类别的简介。空手道世界锦标赛期间,对高级空手道运动员(n = 60)进行了时间动作,战术动作和技术执行的调查。裁判的决定导致整体的活动/休息比率为〜1:1.5,而空手道的体重类别(轻= 1:1.5;中= 1:2和重= 1:1)之间存在显着差异(P = 0.025)。与女性运动员相比,男性的高强度动作(即快速而有力的进攻和防守动作)要高。顶级空手道使用上肢技巧多于下肢技巧,两者都应用在头部而不是身体。对于高强度动作暂停比率和组合技术的百分比,轻量级类别显着高于中级体重类别。这些发现表明,培训计划可能需要针对性别和体重类别的要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号