首页> 外文期刊>Journal of sports sciences. >High intensity interval training vs. high-volume running training during pre-season conditioning in high-level youth football: A cross-over trial
【24h】

High intensity interval training vs. high-volume running training during pre-season conditioning in high-level youth football: A cross-over trial

机译:高水平青年足球季前训练期间的高强度间歇训练与大批量跑步训练:一项交叉试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We aimed at comparing the endurance effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) with high-volume running training (HVT) during pre-season conditioning in 20 high-level youth football players (15.9 (s 0.8) years). Players either conducted HVT or HIIT during the summer preparation period. During winter preparation they performed the other training programme. Before and after each training period several fitness tests were conducted: multi-stage running test (to assess the individual anaerobic threshold (IAT) and maximal running velocity (Vmax)), vertical jumping height, and straight sprinting. A significant increase from pre- to post-test was observed in IAT velocity (P < 0.001) with a greater increase after HVT (+0.8 km · h-1 vs. +0.5 km · h-1 after HIIT, P = 0.04). Maximal velocity during the incremental exercise test also slightly increased with time (P = 0.09). Forty per cent (HIIT) and 15% (HVT) of all players did not improve IAT beyond baseline variability. The players who did not respond to HIIT were significantly slower during 30 m sprinting than responders (P = 0.02). No further significant differences between responders and non-responders were observed. Jump heights deteriorated significantly after both training periods (P < 0.003). Both training programmes seem to be promising means to improve endurance capacity in high-level youth football players during pre-season conditioning.
机译:我们旨在比较20名高水平青年足球运动员在赛季前训练期间的高强度间歇训练(HIIT)和大容量跑步训练(HVT)的耐力效果(15.9(s 0.8)年)。运动员在夏季准备期间进行了HVT或HIIT。在冬季准备期间,他们执行了其他培训计划。在每个训练周期之前和之后,都进行了几个适应性测试:多阶段跑步测试(以评估个体无氧阈值(IAT)和最大跑步速度(Vmax)),垂直跳高和直线冲刺。从测试前到测试后,IAT速度显着增加(P <0.001),HVT后增加更大(HIIT后为+0.8 km·h-1与+0.5 km·h-1,P = 0.04) 。增量运动测试中的最大速度也随时间略有增加(P = 0.09)。在所有参与者中,有40%(HIIT)和15%(HVT)的IAT并未超出基线可变性。对HIIT无反应的运动员在30 m冲刺期间比响应者明显慢(P = 0.02)。没有观察到反应者和非反应者之间的进一步显着差异。在两个训练期之后,跳跃高度均明显下降(P <0.003)。两种训练计划似乎都是有希望的手段,可以在赛季前训练期间提高高水平青年足球运动员的耐力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号