首页> 外文期刊>Journal of sport rehabilitation >The effect of 3 foot pads on plantar pressure of pes planus foot type.
【24h】

The effect of 3 foot pads on plantar pressure of pes planus foot type.

机译:3个脚垫对扁平足类足底压力的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

CONTEXT: Many styles of foot pads are commonly applied to reduce immediate pain and pressure under the foot. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of 3 different foot pads on peak plantar pressure (PPP) and mean plantar pressure (MPP) under the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) during slow running. DESIGN: A 4 (pad) x 4 (mask) repeated-measures design. SETTING: University athletic training clinic and fitness facility. PARTICIPANTS: 20 physically active participants, 12 men (19.7 +/- 1.3 y, 181.5 +/- 6.3 cm, 83.6 +/- 12.3 kg) and 8 women (20.8 +/- 1.5 y, 172.7 +/- 11.2 cm, 69.9 +/- 14.2 kg) with navicular drop greater than or equal to 10 mm, no history of surgery to the lower extremity, and no history of pain or injury to the first MTPJ in the past 6 months. INTERVENTIONS: PPP and MPP were evaluated under 4 areas of the foot: the rear foot, lateral forefoot, medial forefoot, and first MTPJ. Four pad conditions (no pad, metatarsal dome, U-shaped pad, and donut-shaped pad) were evaluated during slow running. All measurements were taken on a standardized treadmill using the Pedar in-shoe pressure-measurement system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: PPP and MPP in 4 designated foot masks during slow running. RESULTS: The metatarsal dome produced significant decreases in MPP (163.07 +/- 49.46) and PPP (228.73 +/- 63.41) when compared with no pad (P < .001). The U-shaped pad significantly decreased MPP (168.68 +/- 50.26) when compared with no pad (P < .001). The donut-shaped pad increased PPP compared with no pad (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The metatarsal dome was most effective in reducing both peak and mean plantar pressure. Other factors such as pad comfort, type of activity, and material availability must also be considered. Further research should be conducted on the applicability to other foot types and symptomatic subjects.
机译:背景:通常使用许多款式的脚垫来减轻脚下的即时疼痛和压力。目的:研究3种不同的脚垫对慢跑过程中第一个meta指关节(MTPJ)下的峰值足底压力(PPP)和平均足底压力(MPP)的影响。设计:4(垫)x 4(遮罩)重复测量设计。地点:大学运动训练诊所和健身设施。参与者:20名体育锻炼参与者,12名男性(19.7 +/- 1.3 y,181.5 +/- 6.3 cm,83.6 +/- 12.3 kg)和8名女性(20.8 +/- 1.5 y,172.7 +/- 11.2 cm,69.9 +/- 14.2千克),且眼前降落大于或等于10毫米,没有下肢手术史,并且在过去6个月内没有第一次MTPJ的疼痛或损伤史。干预措施:在脚的4个区域(后脚,外侧前脚,内侧前脚和第一个MTPJ)评估PPP和MPP。在慢速行驶过程中,评估了四种垫条件(无垫,meta骨圆顶,U形垫和甜甜圈形垫)。所有测量均使用Pedar鞋内压力测量系统在标准跑步机上进行。主要观察指标:慢跑过程中4个指定脚罩中的PPP和MPP。结果:与无垫块相比,meta骨穹顶的MPP(163.07 +/- 49.46)和PPP(228.73 +/- 63.41)明显降低(P <.001)。与无垫板相比,U形垫板可显着降低MPP(168.68 +/- 50.26)(P <.001)。与无垫相比,甜甜圈形垫增加了PPP(P <.001)。结论:The骨穹顶在降低峰值压力和平均足底压力方面最有效。还必须考虑其他因素,例如垫的舒适性,活动的类型和材料的可用性。应针对其他足部类型和有症状的受试者进行进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号