...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >Effect of concurrent training, flexible nonlinear periodization, and maximal-effort cycling on strength and power
【24h】

Effect of concurrent training, flexible nonlinear periodization, and maximal-effort cycling on strength and power

机译:并行训练,灵活的非线性周期化和最大努力循环对力量和力量的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Although there is considerable research on concurrent training, none has integrated flexible nonlinear periodization and maximal-effort cycling in the same design. The purpose of this investigation was to test outcome measures of strength and power using a pretest-posttest randomized groups design. A strength and endurance (SE) group was compared with a strength, endurance, and maximal-effort cycling (SEC) group. Both groups used a flexible nonlinear periodization design. Thirteen male and 7 female students (mean ± SD: age, 22.5 ± 4.1 years; height, 173.5 ± 12.4 cm; weight, 79.4 ± 20.2 kg; strength training experience, 2.4 ± 2.2 years) participated in this study. Groups were not matched for age, height, weight, strength training experience, or sex, but were randomly assigned to an SE (n = 10) or SEC (n = 10) group. All training was completed within 45 minutes, twice per week (Monday and Wednesday), over 12 consecutive weeks. Both groups were assigned 6.75 total hours of aerobic conditioning, and 13.5 hours of free weight and machine exercises totaling 3,188 repetitions ranging from 5 to 20 repetition maximums. The SEC group performed 2 cycling intervals per workout ranging from 10 to 45 seconds. Pretest and posttest measures included chest press and standing broad jump. Analysis of variance showed that there were no significant differences between the SE and SEC groups on measures of chest press or standing broad jump performance (p, not significant). Paired sample t-tests (p = 0.05) showed significant improvement in strength and power in all groups (pretest to posttest), except for SE jump performance (p, not significant). In conclusion, adding maximal-effort cycling does not provide additional strength or power benefits to a concurrent flexible nonlinear training program. However, an exercise professional can take confidence that a concurrent flexible nonlinear training program can increase strength and power in healthy individuals.
机译:尽管对并行训练有大量研究,但没有一个在同一设计中集成了灵活的非线性周期和最大努力循环。这项研究的目的是使用前测后测随机分组设计来测试力量和力量的结局指标。将力量和耐力(SE)组与力量,耐力和最大努力骑行(SEC)组进行比较。两组都使用了灵活的非线性周期设计。十三名男生和七名女学生(平均±SD:年龄,22.5±4.1岁;身高,173.5±12.4 cm;体重,79.4±20.2 kg;力量训练经验,2.4±2.2岁)参加了这项研究。各组的年龄,身高,体重,力量训练经验或性别均不匹配,但被随机分为SE(n = 10)或SEC(n = 10)组。所有训练均在45分钟内完成,每周两次(星期一和星期三),连续12周。两组的总有氧运动时间为6.75小时,自由重量和机器锻炼时间为13.5小时,总共3188次重复,最大重复次数为5到20次。 SEC组在每次锻炼中执行2次循环间隔,范围从10到45秒。测试前和测试后的措施包括胸部按压和站立跳远。方差分析表明,SE组和SEC组之间在胸部按压或站立式广泛跳跃表现方面无显着差异(p,不显着)。配对样本t检验(p = 0.05)显示,除SE跳跃表现外(p,无显着性),所有组(测试前至测试后)的力量和力量都有显着改善。总而言之,增加最大努力循环不会为并发的灵活非线性训练程序提供额外的力量或力量优势。但是,运动专业人员可以放心,同时进行的灵活的非线性训练程序可以增加健康个体的力量和力量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号