首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >A comparison of three training programs with the same workload on overhead throwing velocity with different weighted balls.
【24h】

A comparison of three training programs with the same workload on overhead throwing velocity with different weighted balls.

机译:三种工作负荷相同的训练程序在不同重量球上的头顶掷球速度的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to determine if different throwing programs based upon velocity (throwing with a regular sized soccer ball), resistance (throwing with heavy medicine ball), or a combination of both with the same workload would enhance 2-handed overhead throwing velocity with different ball weights. Sixty-eight high-school students (16.5 +/- 1.8 years, 57.8 +/- 12 kg, 164 +/- 9 cm), divided into 3 groups, participated in the study. The training programs were matched on total workload, which resulted in the velocity-training group performing 6 series of 14 reps per session with soccer balls, whereas the resistance-training group performed 3 series of 6 throws with a 3-kg medicine ball, and the combination-training group threw 9 times with a 3-kg medicine ball and 3 series of 14 reps with a soccer ball per session. Throwing velocity with a soccer ball, a 1- and 3-kg medicine ball was tested before and after a training period of 6 weeks with 2 sessions per week. A significant (p
机译:这项研究的目的是确定基于速度(使用常规大小的足球进行投掷),阻力(使用重药球进行投掷)或同时具有相同工作量的两种组合使用不同的投掷程序是否会增强两手开销投掷不同球重的速度。分为三组的六十八名高中学生(16.5 +/- 1.8岁,57.8 +/- 12 kg,164 +/- 9 cm)参加了研究。训练计划根据总工作量进行了匹配,这导致速度训练组每节训练6个系列,每节14次足球,而阻力训练组进行3个系列,每6次掷3公斤药球,联合训练小组每节课用3公斤重的药球投掷9次,并用3个系列的14个代表投掷足球。在训练周期为6周(每周2次)之前和之后,测试了一个足球,一个1公斤和3公斤药球的投掷速度。在训练6周后,使用足球(6.9%)和1-kg药球(2.8%)的投掷速度显着提高(p

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号