首页> 外文期刊>Journal of spinal disorders & techniques. >Robotic resection of huge presacral tumors: Case series and comparison with an open resection
【24h】

Robotic resection of huge presacral tumors: Case series and comparison with an open resection

机译:巨大的s骨前肿瘤的机器人切除术:病例系列和开放性切除术的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Study Design: Clinical case series and analysis. Objective: The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of robotic presacral tumor resection compared with conventional open approach. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Conventional open approach for huge presacral tumors in the retroperitoneal space often demands excessive hospitalization and poor cosmesis. Furthermore, narrow surgical field sometimes interrupt delicate procedures. METHODS: Nine patients with huge (diameter >10 cm) presacral tumors underwent surgery. Five patients among them had robotic procedure and the others had open transperitoneal tumor resection. Operation time, blood loss, hospitalization, and complications were analyzed. Results: Robotic presacral tumor resection showed shorter operation time, less bleeding, and shorter hospitalization. Moreover, there was no complication related to abdominal adhesion. Conclusions: Although robotic resection for presacral tumor still has limitations technically and economically, robotic resection for huge presacral tumors demonstrated advantages over open resection specifically for benign neurogenic tumors.
机译:研究设计:临床病例系列和分析。目的:本研究的目的是评估与常规开放手术相比,机器人s骨前肿瘤切除术的优缺点。背景数据概述:对于腹膜后间隙中巨大的s前肿瘤,传统的开放治疗方法通常需要过度住院和美容不良。此外,狭窄的手术区域有时会中断精细的手术。方法:9例巨大(直径> 10 cm)的s骨前肿瘤患者接受了手术。其中5例患者采用了机器人手术,其他患者进行了经腹膜开放性肿瘤切除术。分析手术时间,失血量,住院率和并发症。结果:机器人行ral前肿瘤切除术显示手术时间短,出血少,住院时间短。而且,没有与腹部粘连有关的并发症。结论:尽管机器人切除s骨前肿瘤在技术上和经济上仍存在局限性,但针对巨大的ral骨前肿瘤的机器人切除术比开放切除术具有更好的优势,特别是对于良性神经源性肿瘤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号