首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psychosomatic research >Comparisons of childhood trauma, alexithymia, and defensive styles in patients with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures vs. epilepsy: Implications for the etiology of conversion disorder
【24h】

Comparisons of childhood trauma, alexithymia, and defensive styles in patients with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures vs. epilepsy: Implications for the etiology of conversion disorder

机译:心理性非癫痫性癫痫与癫痫患者的童年创伤,运动障碍和防御方式的比较:对转化障碍的病因学的启示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: It has been theorized that conversion disorder is the result of emotion that cannot be experienced consciously as feeling states or put into words (i.e., alexithymia), but there is little confirming empirical evidence. We sought to characterize subjects with conversion disorder compared to subjects with a distinct medical illness, using the model of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) vs. epilepsy (ES), on measures of childhood traumatic experience, alexithymia and maturity of psychological defensive strategies. Methods: All subjects admitted to the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit of the University of Cincinnati Medical Center were offered self-report questionnaires (Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 and Response Evaluation Measure-71) at the outset of evaluation. Diagnosis of each subject was confirmed by video-EEG and we compared subjects with PNES to those with ES on these measures. Results: 82 subjects had ES AND 96 had PNES. Those with PNES were significantly more likely to have experienced childhood trauma in all domains (p. = .005 to p. = .05), and were significantly more likely to have alexithymia (p. = .0267). There was a significant difference in the capacity to identify feelings, and a trend towards significance in capacity to describe feelings. There were no differences in defensive styles between the two groups. Conclusions: PNES diagnosis was associated with female sex, higher alexithymia scores and higher rates of childhood trauma, but not with differences in defensive styles compared to ES. These findings add empirical evidence for theories regarding the cause of conversion disorder and may aid in the design of prospective treatment trials in patients with conversion disorder.
机译:背景:从理论上讲,转换障碍是情绪的结果,这种情绪不能作为感觉状态或言语(例如,智力障碍)有意识地经历,但很少有确凿的经验证据。我们试图使用心理性非癫痫发作(PNES)与癫痫症(ES)的模型来表征与患有明显内科疾病的受试者相比具有转化障碍的受试者,并评估其童年创伤经历,运动障碍和心理防御策略的成熟度。方法:在评估开始时,向辛辛那提大学医学中心癫痫监测部门收治的所有受试者均提供自我报告调查表(儿童创伤问卷,多伦多Alexithymia量表20和反应评估方法71)。通过视频脑电图证实了每个受试者的诊断,并且我们在这些指标上将PNES受试者与ES受试者进行了比较。结果:82名受试者患有ES,96名受试者患有PNES。患有PNES的人在所有领域中更有可能遭受童年创伤(p。= 0.005至p。= 0.05),并且有明显的无力症(p。= 0.0267)。识别感觉的能力存在显着差异,而描述感觉的能力也趋于重要。两组之间的防守风格没有差异。结论:PNES的诊断与女性,运动障碍评分较高和儿童创伤率较高有关,但与ES相比,防御方式没有差异。这些发现为有关转化障碍原因的理论提供了经验证据,并可能有助于设计转化障碍患者的前瞻性治疗试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号