首页> 外文期刊>Journal of patient safety >Operating room clinicians' ratings of workload: A vignette simulation study
【24h】

Operating room clinicians' ratings of workload: A vignette simulation study

机译:手术室临床医生的工作量评估:小插图模拟研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Increased clinician workload is associated with medical errors and patient harm. The Quality and Workload Assessment Tool (QWAT) measures anticipated (pre-case) and perceived (post-case) clinical workload during actual surgical procedures using ratings of individual and team case difficulty from every operating room (OR) team member. The purpose of this study was to examine the QWAT ratings of OR clinicians who were not present in the OR but who read vignettes compiled from actual case documentation to assess interrater reliability and agreement with ratings made by clinicians involved in the actual cases. METHODS: Thirty-six OR clinicians (13 anesthesia providers, 11 surgeons, and 12 nurses) used the QWAT to rate 6 cases varying from easy to moderately difficult based on actual ratings made by clinicians involved with the cases. Cases were presented and rated in random order. Before rating anticipated individual and team difficulty, the raters read prepared clinical vignettes containing case synopses and much of the same written case information that was available to the actual clinicians before the onset of each case. Then, before rating perceived individual and team difficulty, they read part 2 of the vignette consisting of detailed role-specific intraoperative data regarding the anesthetic and surgical course, unusual events, and other relevant contextual factors. RESULTS: Surgeons had higher interrater reliability on the QWAT than did OR nurses or anesthesia providers. For the anticipated individual and team workload ratings, there were no statistically significant differences between the actual ratings and the ratings obtained from the vignettes. There were differences for the 3 provider types in perceived individual workload for the median difficulty cases and in the perceived team workload for the median and more difficult cases. CONCLUSIONS: The case difficulty items on the QWAT seem to be sufficiently reliable and valid to be used in other studies of anticipated and perceived clinical workload of surgeons. Perhaps because of the limitations of the clinical documentation shown to anesthesia providers and OR nurses in the current vignette study, more evidence needs to be gathered to demonstrate the criterion-related validity of the QWAT difficulty items for assessing the workload of nonsurgeon OR clinicians.
机译:目的:增加临床工作量与医疗错误和患者伤害有关。质量和工作量评估工具(QWAT)使用来自每个手术室(OR)团队成员的个人和团队案例难易度来评估实际手术过程中预期的(病例前)和感知的(病例后)临床工作量。这项研究的目的是检查没有在OR中但阅读了从实际病例文档汇编而来的晕影的OR临床医生的QWAT等级,以评估间位的可靠性,并与涉及实际病例的临床医师做出的评级相一致。方法:根据涉及病例的临床医生的实际评分,三十六名OR临床医生(13名麻醉提供者,11名外科医师和12名护士)使用QWAT对6例从轻度到中度困难的病例进行了评分。病例按随机顺序进行介绍和评分。在对预期的个人和团队难度进行评分之前,评分者会阅读准备好的临床短片,其中包含病例提要和在每个病例发作之前可供实际临床医生使用的许多书面病例信息。然后,在对个人和团队的困难程度进行评级之前,他们阅读了小插图的第2部分,该小部分由具体的特定角色术中数据组成,这些数据涉及麻醉和手术过程,异常事件以及其他相关的背景因素。结果:外科医生在QWAT上具有比OR护士或麻醉师更高的间质可靠性。对于预期的个人和团队工作负荷等级,实际等级与从小插曲获得的等级之间在统计上没有显着差异。对于中位数难度案例,这三种提供者类型在感知的个人工作量以及在中位数和较困难的案例中,在感知的团队工作量方面存在差异。结论:QWAT上的病例困难项目似乎足够可靠和有效,可用于其他有关外科医生预期和感知的临床工作量的研究。可能由于当前小插图研究中麻醉提供者和OR护士所显示的临床文档的局限性,需要收集更多证据来证明QWAT困难项目与标准相关的有效性,以评估非外科医生或临床医生的工作量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号