首页> 外文期刊>International psychogeriatrics >Clinician and caregiver agreement on neuropsychiatric symptom severity: A study using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory -Clinician rating scale (NPI-C)
【24h】

Clinician and caregiver agreement on neuropsychiatric symptom severity: A study using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory -Clinician rating scale (NPI-C)

机译:神经精神症状症状严重程度的临床医生和护理人员协议:使用神经精神病学量表的研究-临床医生评分量表(NPI-C)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are highly prevalent in dementia. The recently developed Neuropsychiatric Inventory -Clinician rating scale (NPI-C) includes clinical judgment and new symptom domains. Our objective was to evaluate NPI-C reliability and to compare caregiver and clinician ratings across the range of mild to severe cognitive impairment. Methods: This is a cross-sectional observational study. Participants were geriatric memory clinic patients and nursing-home residents (n = 30) with an established diagnosis of dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). A psychiatrist (MK) interviewed caregiver-patient dyads using the NPI-C. Neuropsychological tests and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) were used to assess cognitive impairment. Two NPI-C caregiver interviews were videotaped and rated by psychologists and geriatricians. Intra-class correlations (ICCs) were used to examine inter-rater agreement. Correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate caregiver and psychiatrist NPI-C ratings. Disagreement between caregiver and clinician was expressed in delta scores and examined across the range of mild to severe cognitive impairment, using Levene's homogeneity of variances tests. Results: Inter-rater agreement on ratings of two caregiver videos was high (ICC = 0.99-1.0). Clinician-caregiver concordance on NPI-C total severity ratings was high (r = 0.77). Variability in clinician-caregiver concordance was associated with cognitive impairment: MMSE (P = 0.02), CAMCOG-R (Cambridge Cognitive Examination-revised) total scores (P = 0.02), CAMCOG-R Memory scores (P = 0.04) and Language scores (P = 0.01). Conclusions: The NPI-C is a reliable measure of NPS in patients with MCI or dementia. Clinician-caregiver agreement on NPS severity may vary with cognitive impairment, underlining the importance of clinician-based measures of NPS.
机译:背景:神经精神症状(NPS)在痴呆症中非常普遍。最近开发的神经精神病学量表-临床医生评分量表(NPI-C)包括临床判断和新的症状域。我们的目标是评估NPI-C的可靠性,并在轻度至重度认知障碍的范围内比较护理人员和临床医生的评分。方法:这是一项横断面观察研究。参与者是老年痴呆诊所患者和疗养院居民(n = 30),他们已被诊断出患有痴呆症或轻度认知障碍(MCI)。一名精神科医生(MK)使用NPI-C采访了护理人员-患者的二元组。神经心理学测试和迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)用于评估认知障碍。心理医生和老年医生对两次NPI-C照护者访谈进行了录像和评分。类内相关性(ICC)用于检查评分者之间的一致性。计算相关系数以评估护理人员和精神科医生的NPI-C评分。护理人员与临床医生之间的分歧以德尔塔评分表示,并使用Levene方差检验的同质性在轻度至重度认知障碍的范围内进行检查。结果:在两个看护者视频的评分中,评分者之间的一致性很高(ICC = 0.99-1.0)。 NPI-C总严重程度评分的临床医生-护理人员一致性很高(r = 0.77)。临床医生与护理人员的一致性差异与认知障碍有关:MMSE(P = 0.02),CAMCOG-R(经剑桥认知检查修订)总分(P = 0.02),CAMCOG-R记忆力得分(P = 0.04)和语言得分(P = 0.01)。结论:NPI-C是MCI或痴呆患者NPS的可靠指标。临床医生与护理人员就NPS严重性达成的协议可能会因认知障碍而有所不同,这突显了基于临床医生对NPS进行测量的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号