...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of pharmacology & toxicology. >Prescribing pattern of fixed dose combinations focus on cardiovascular drugs in out patient department of private hospitals
【24h】

Prescribing pattern of fixed dose combinations focus on cardiovascular drugs in out patient department of private hospitals

机译:固定剂量组合的处方模式侧重于私立医院门诊患者的心血管药物

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study was carried out to find the drug prescribing pattern and rationality of cardiovascular Fixed Dose Combinations (FDCs) at out patient department of private hospitals in East Godavari District andhrapradesh, India. Prescriptions of 620 patients suffered by cardiovascular diseases were collected over a period of five months and analysed for average number of drugs per prescription. Collected prescriptions were screened for fixed dose combinations and it classified according to patient's age, gender, duration of drug therapy, cost effectiveness was compared with monotherapy, dosage forms, therapeutic category and dose strength was taken into consideration for evaluate prescribing pattern. Average number of drugs per prescription was 3.65±0.08. Out of 620 cardiovascular prescriptions 234 prescriptions found to have FDCs. In 234 (37.7%) prescriptions, 17 different FDCs were prescribed. Among 234 FDC prescriptions, 124 (52.9%) FDC prescriptions were prescribed for the age group 51-60 years. All the cardiovascular FDCs were prescribed in oral solid dosage forms. Majority of FDCs (46.2%) were prescribed for 1-2 months. In 17 different FDCs, 14 (82.4%) were belongs to antihypertensive category. Out of 17 FDCs analysed, 76.4% were found to be more cost effective than their total cost of individual components. For few FDCs like Telmisartan with Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), Enalapril with HCTZ, Bisoprolol with HCTZ, the total cost of combination was found to be less than that of FDCs. Most of the cardiovascular prescriptions contain Fixed Dose Combinations (FDCs) and most of the FDCs were cost effective but out of total FDCs studied none of them was in accordance with WHO essential medical list and National List of Essential Medicine. So, the rationality behind these combinations was questionable. It seems to be further more clinical trials need for these FDCs to substantiate their safety and efficacy.
机译:这项研究的目的是在印度东戈达瓦里区和哈拉普拉德什的私立医院门诊患者中,找到心血管固定剂量组合(FDC)的药物处方模式和合理性。在五个月的时间内收集了620例患有心血管疾病的患者的处方,并对每个处方中的平均药物数量进行了分析。对收集的处方进行固定剂量组合筛选,并根据患者的年龄,性别,药物治疗时间进行分类,将成本效益与单药治疗进行比较,考虑剂型,治疗类别和剂量强度,以评估处方方式。每个处方的平均药物数量为3.65±0.08。在620张心血管处方中,发现234张患有FDC。在234张(37.7%)处方中,处方了17种不同的FDC。在234个FDC处方中,针对51-60岁年龄组的124个FDC处方被处方。所有心血管FDC均以口服固体剂型处方。多数FDC(46.2%)的处方时间为1-2个月。在17个不同的FDC中,有14个(82.4%)属于降压类别。在分析的17个FDC中,有76.4%的成本效益高于其单个组件的总成本。对于很少的FDC,如替米沙坦与氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ),依那普利与HCTZ,比索洛尔与HCTZ,组合的总成本低于FDC。大多数心血管处方都包含固定剂量组合(FDC),并且大多数FDC具有成本效益,但在研究的所有FDC中,没有一个符合WHO的基本药物目录和国家基本药物目录。因此,这些组合背后的合理性值得怀疑。这些FDC证实其安全性和有效性似乎还需要进行更多的临床试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号