...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of physical activity & health >Reliability of the Pictorial Scale of Perceived Movement Skill Competence in 2 Diverse Samples of Young Children
【24h】

Reliability of the Pictorial Scale of Perceived Movement Skill Competence in 2 Diverse Samples of Young Children

机译:2种不同的幼儿感知的运动技能能力的图形量表的可靠性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: The purpose was to determine the reliability of an instrument designed to assess young children's perceived movement skill competence in 2 diverse samples. Methods: A pictorial instrument assessed 12 perceived Fundamental Movement Skills (FMS) based on the Test of Gross Motor Development 2nd edition. Intra-Class Correlations (ICC) and internal consistency analyses were conducted. Paired sample t tests assessed change in mean perceived skill scores. Bivariate correlations between the intertrial difference and the mean of the trials explored proportional bias. Results: Sample 1 (Si) were culturally diverse Australian children (n = 111; 52% boys) aged 5 to 8 years (mean = 6.4, SD = 1.0) with educated parents. Sample 2 (S2) were racially diverse and socioeconomically disadvantaged American children (n = 110; 57% boys) aged 5 to 10 years (mean = 6.8, SD = 1.1). For all children, the internal consistency for 12 FMS was acceptable (S1 = 0.72, 0.75, S2 = 0.66, 0.67). ICCs were higher in S1 (0.73) than S2 (0.50). Mean changes between trials were small. There was little evidence of proportional bias. Conclusion: Lower values in S2 may be due to differences in study demographic and execution. While the instrument demonstrated reliability/internal consistency, further work is recommended in diverse samples.
机译:背景:目的是确定一种旨在评估幼儿在2个不同样本中感知的运动技能能力的仪器的可靠性。方法:基于第二版《大运动发育测试》的图形工具评估了12种感知的基本运动技能(FMS)。进行了类内相关性(ICC)和内部一致性分析。配对样本t检验评估了平均感知技能得分的变化。试验间差异与试验均值之间的双变量相关性探讨了比例偏差。结果:样本1(Si)是5岁至8岁(平均= 6.4,SD = 1.0)且受过教育的父母的澳大利亚多元文化儿童(n = 111; 52%的男孩)。样本2(S2)是5至10岁(平均= 6.8,SD = 1.1)的种族多样化且在社会经济方面处于不利地位的美国儿童(n = 110; 57%的男孩)。对于所有儿童,12 FMS的内部一致性都可以接受(S1 = 0.72,0.75,S2 = 0.66,0.67)。 S1(0.73)中的ICC高于S2(0.50)。试验之间的平均变化很小。几乎没有证据表明存在比例偏差。结论:S2中较低的值可能是由于研究人口统计学和执行情况的差异。尽管仪器显示出可靠性/内部一致性,但建议在各种样品中做进一步的工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号