【24h】

Evaluation of the Architect tacrolimus assay in kidney, liver, and heart transplant recipients.

机译:在肾脏,肝脏和心脏移植接受者中评估他克莫司测定的建筑师。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The narrow therapeutic range of tacrolimus requires therapeutic drug monitoring to prevent transplant rejection and to minimize nephrotoxicity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analytical performance of the tacrolimus chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) in everyday practice comparatively with other methods. CMIA imprecision and accuracy were tested using low, medium, and high concentrations in control samples. The limits of quantification (LOQ) of CMIA and antibody-conjugated magnetic immunoassay (ACMIA) were evaluated using negative whole-blood samples containing 0.4-5.7 ng/ml of tacrolimus from a stock solution. CMIA was compared with ACMIA, enzyme multiplied immunoassay (EMIT), and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), using 176 samples from recipients (135 men and 41 women) of heart (n=19), kidney (n=107), or liver (n=50) transplants. CMIA total precision was 5.7%, 3.7% and 3.6% with the low-, medium-, and high-concentration controls, respectively; corresponding values for accuracy were 98%, 104%, and 104%. LOQ was 0.5 (95%CI, 0.22-1.38) with CMIA and 2.5 ng/ml with ACMIA. Linear regression results were as follows: CMIA=1.2LC-MS/MS+0.14 (r=0.98); CMIA=0.93EMIT+0.36 (r=0.975); CMIA=1.15ACMIA-0.25 (r=0.988); and, for tacrolimus concentrations in the 1-15 ng/ml range, of special interest as many transplant recipients are given low-dose tacrolimus, CMIA=1.05LC-MS/MS+0.38 (r=0.94). Two patients had falsely elevated tacrolimus concentrations due to interference in the ACMIA assay; one was a renal transplant recipient who stopped her treatment and had tacrolimus concentrations of 12.5 ng/ml by ACMIA and <0.5 ng/ml by CMIA; the other was an HIV-positive renal transplant recipient whose tacrolimus concentrations by ACMIA were 1.8-43.7-fold those by CMIA. Such interferences with ACMIA, which may be related to endogenous antibodies in the plasma, are likely to negatively impact patient care. In conclusion, the tacrolimus CMIA assay is suitable for routine laboratory use and does not suffer from the interferences seen with ACMIA in some patients.
机译:他克莫司的狭窄治疗范围需要对治疗药物进行监测,以防止移植排斥并最大程度地降低肾毒性。这项研究的目的是评估他克莫司化学发光微粒免疫分析(CMIA)在日常实践中与其他方法的比较分析性能。使用低,中和高浓度的对照样品测试CMIA的不准确性和准确性。使用包含0.4-5.7 ng / ml他克莫司的储备液阴性全血样品评估CMIA和抗体偶联磁免疫测定(ACMIA)的定量限。使用来自心脏(n = 19),肾脏(n = 19)的接受者(135名男性和41名女性)的176个样本,将CMIA与ACMIA,酶多重免疫测定(EMIT)和液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS / MS)进行了比较。 n = 107)或肝脏(n = 50)移植。在低,中和高浓度控制下,CMIA的总精度分别为5.7%,3.7%和3.6%;相应的准确性值为98%,104%和104%。 CMIA的LOQ为0.5(95%CI,0.22-1.38),ACMIA的LOQ为2.5 ng / ml。线性回归结果如下:CMIA = 1.2LC-MS / MS + 0.14(r = 0.98); CMIA = 0.93EMIT + 0.36(r = 0.975); CMIA = 1.15ACMIA-0.25(r = 0.988);对于1-15 ng / ml范围内的他克莫司浓度,由于许多移植接受者接受了低剂量他克莫司的治疗,CMIA = 1.05LC-MS / MS + 0.38(r = 0.94)引起了人们的特别关注。两名患者由于干扰ACMIA分析而错误地升高了他克莫司的浓度;一个是接受肾移植的患者,他停止了治疗,他克莫司浓度在ACMIA中为12.5 ng / ml,在CMIA中为<0.5 ng / ml。另一位是艾滋病毒阳性的肾移植受者,其ACMIA的他克莫司浓度为CMIA的1.8-43.7倍。对ACMIA的此类干扰可能与血浆中的内源性抗体有关,可能会对患者的护理产生负面影响。总之,他克莫司CMIA测定法适合常规实验室使用,并且在某些患者中不会受到ACMIA的干扰。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号