首页> 外文期刊>Journal of orthopaedic trauma >A Comparison of Three C-Arm Draping Techniques to Minimize Contamination of the Surgical Field
【24h】

A Comparison of Three C-Arm Draping Techniques to Minimize Contamination of the Surgical Field

机译:三种C型臂悬垂技术使手术区域污染最小化的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The use of intraoperative fluoroscopy has become a routine and useful adjunct within orthopaedic surgery. However, the fluoroscopy machine may become an additional source of contamination in the operating room, particularly when maneuvering from the anterior-posterior position to the lateral position. Consequently, draping techniques were developed to maintain sterility of the operative field and surgeon. Despite a variety of methods, no studies exist to compare the sterility of these techniques specifically when the fluoroscopy machine is in the lateral imaging position. We evaluated the sterility of 3 c-arm draping techniques in a simulated operative environment. The 3 techniques consisted of a traditional 3-quarter sterile sheet attached to the side of the operative table, a modified clip-drape method, and a commercially available sterile pouch. Our study demonstrated that the traditional method poses a high risk for sterile field contamination, whereas the modified clip-drape method and commercially available sterile pouch kept floor contamination furthest from the surgical field. With the current data, we urge surgeons to use modified techniques rather than the traditional draping method.
机译:在骨科手术中,术中透视的使用已成为常规和有用的辅助手段。但是,荧光检查仪可能成为手术室中的另一种污染源,尤其是在从前后位置向侧面位置移动时。因此,开发了悬垂技术以保持手术区域和外科医生的无菌状态。尽管有多种方法,但尚无研究比较这些技术的无菌性,特别是当荧光检查仪位于侧面成像位置时。我们在模拟的手术环境中评估了3种C型悬垂技术的无菌性。这3种技术包括:附着在手术台侧面的传统的四分之三无菌床单,改良的夹子悬垂法和可商购的无菌袋。我们的研究表明,传统方法对无菌区污染构成高风险,而改良的夹布式方法和市售无菌袋则使地板污染距手术区最远。根据当前数据,我们敦促外科医生使用改良的技术,而不是传统的铺盖方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号