...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of medical ethics >Fair subject selection in clinical research: formal equality of opportunity
【24h】

Fair subject selection in clinical research: formal equality of opportunity

机译:临床研究中公平的主题选择:机会的形式平等

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper, I explore the ethics of subject selection in the context of biomedical research. I reject a key principle of what I shall refer to as the standard view. According to this principle, investigators should select participants so as to minimise aggregate risk to participants and maximise aggregate benefits to participants and society. On this view, investigators should exclude prospective participants who are more susceptible to risk than other prospective participants. I argue instead that investigators should select subjects in accordance with an alternative principle: formal equality of opportunity. According to this principle, investigators must treat all prospective participants the same unless differential treatment is warranted by the scientific goals of the study or the need to promote participants' medically related interests. All prospective participants (1) who meet the scientifically defined eligibility criteria and (2) for whom participation is consistent with their medically related interests should have an equal, formal opportunity to participate in the study. Prospective participants should not be excluded simply because they are more susceptible to risk than others.
机译:在本文中,我将探讨生物医学研究背景下的学科选择伦理。我拒绝所谓标准视图的关键原则。根据此原则,研究人员应选择参与者,以最大程度地降低参与者的总体风险,并最大限度地提高参与者和社会的总体利益。根据这种观点,研究者应排除比其他潜在参与者更容易遭受风险的潜在参与者。相反,我认为调查人员应根据另一种原则:机会的形式平等选择主题。根据此原则,除非研究的科学目标或需要提高参与者的医学利益的必要性,否则研究人员必须对所有潜在参与者进行相同的对待。所有预期参与者(1)符合科学定义的资格标准,以及(2)参与符合其医学相关利益的参与者,应有平等的正式机会参加研究。不应仅仅因为有意参加的人比其他人更容易遭受风险而被排除在外。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号