首页> 外文期刊>Journal of health psychology >How meaningful are data from Likert scales? An evaluation of how ratings are made and the role of the response shift in the socially disadvantaged
【24h】

How meaningful are data from Likert scales? An evaluation of how ratings are made and the role of the response shift in the socially disadvantaged

机译:利克特量表的数据意义何在?评估如何进行评分以及应对措施在社会弱势群体中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Likert scales relating to quality of life were completed by the homeless (N = 75); first year students (N = 301) and a town population (N = 72). Participants also completed free text questions. The scale and free text data were often contradictory and the results highlighted three processes to account for these disparities: i) frame of reference: current salient issues influenced how questions were interpreted; ii) within-subject comparisons: ratings were based on expectations given past experiences; iii) time frame: those with more stable circumstances showed habituation to their level of deprivation. Likert scale data should be understood within the context of how ratings are made.
机译:与生活质量有关的李克特量表由无家可归者完成(N = 75);大一学生(N = 301)和城镇人口(N = 72)。参与者还完成了自由文本问题。规模和自由文本数据通常是矛盾的,结果突出说明了解决这些差异的三个过程:i)参考框架:当前的突出问题影响了问题的解释方式; ii)受试者内部比较:评分是基于对过去经验的期望; iii)时间范围:处境更加稳定的人表现出对被剥夺程度的习惯。应该在如何进行评级的背景下理解李克特量表数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号