...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of hypertension >Patterns of treatment modifications among newly treated hypertensive patients: does choice of modification strategy affect likelihood of treatment discontinuation?
【24h】

Patterns of treatment modifications among newly treated hypertensive patients: does choice of modification strategy affect likelihood of treatment discontinuation?

机译:新治疗的高血压患者的治疗修改模式:修改策略的选择是否会影响治疗中断的可能性?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives:Treatment modifications - addition, uptitration, switching, and downtitration - are necessary to address issues such as unattained blood pressure goals, adverse drug events, drug cost, or patient dissatisfaction which lead to treatment discontinuation. This study assessed the patterns of treatment modifications, and compared the rates of treatment modification and time-to-treatment modification across five antihypertensive drug classes (ADCs). Additionally, the association between treatment modification strategies and the likelihood of treatment discontinuation was assessed.Methods:This is a retrospective cohort study using the BlueCross-BlueShield of Texas commercial claims database (2008-2012). Treatment modifications that occurred within 1 year of starting hypertension treatment were identified. Patients who received treatment modifications were followed for 12 months to determine if and when they discontinued treatment. Cox regression models were used to determine the likelihood of treatment modification and treatment discontinuation.Results:About 48.5% of patients received treatment modifications within 1 year of treatment initiation. Rates of treatment modification were significantly different across ADCs; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker users were less likely to receive treatment modifications compared with other ADCs. Mean time-to-treatment modification was more than 100 days for adding and uptitrating, and more than140 days for switching and downtitrating. Patients intensifying treatment by adding medications were about 25% (vs. uptitration) and 50% (vs. switching) less likely to discontinue treatment.Conclusion:Treatment modifications are common among newly treated hypertensive patients, and the rates vary significantly across ADCs. In the real world, treatment modifications occur much later than the 30-day timeline recommended by guidelines. Addition of drugs may be a preferred approach for intensifying treatment of patients at a high risk of treatment discontinuation.
机译:目标:应对治疗进行修改-增加,滴定,转换和滴定-以解决血压目标未达到,药物不良事件,药物成本或患者不满意等问题,从而导致治疗中断。这项研究评估了治疗修饰的模式,并比较了五种降压药类别(ADC)的治疗修饰率和治疗时间。此外,还评估了治疗修改策略与治疗中止可能性之间的关联。方法:这是一项使用德克萨斯州商业索赔数据库BlueCross-BlueShield的回顾性队列研究(2008-2012年)。确定在开始高血压治疗后1年内发生的治疗修改。接受治疗修改的患者随访12个月,以确定是否以及何时停止治疗。结果:在开始治疗的1年内,约有48.5%的患者接受了治疗修改。 ADC之间的治疗修改率显着不同。与其他ADC相比,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂的使用者接受治疗修改的可能性较小。添加和滴定的平均治疗时间修改超过100天,而切换和滴定的平均治疗时间超过140天。通过添加药物加强治疗的患者中止治疗的可能性降低了约25%(相对于滴定)和50%(相对于转换)。结论:治疗改变在新治疗的高血压患者中很常见,并且在不同的ADC中发生率差异很大。在现实世界中,治疗修改发生的时间比指南建议的30天时间表晚得多。在高中止治疗风险的患者中,添加药物可能是加强患者治疗的首选方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号