首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Forestry >Divergent Trends in Accredited Forestry Programs in the United States: Implications for Research and Education
【24h】

Divergent Trends in Accredited Forestry Programs in the United States: Implications for Research and Education

机译:美国认可的林业计划的不同趋势:对研究和教育的启示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Undergraduate forestry programs in the United States have been accredited by the Society of American Foresters since 1935. Over the subsequent 75 years, the list of accredited undergraduate programs has grown, but several of the original programs have recently dropped their forestry programs or their accreditation When forestry programs were first accredited in the United States, they were all housed in larger research universities. In recent decades, there has been a contraction of forestry programs at universities with a strong research/doctoral education emphasis and an expansion at other universities and colleges in programs with little or no research/doctoral education. This trend is also apparent if the number of graduates by current Carnegie classification is compared from 1935 to 1960 with 2010. These trends raise important questions regarding forestry education at a time when many are calling for more broadly trained foresters that can understand and apply emerging science and management trends. If this trend continues, it might result in more narrowly trained foresters and shortages of researchers and teachers with professional training. For a profession that prides itself on advancing the "science, education, technology, and practice of forestry," these trends suggest a future where the science becomes increasingly separated from the practice.
机译:自1935年以来,美国的林业本科课程已获得美国林务员协会的认可。在随后的75年中,获得认证的本科课程的列表有所增加,但是一些原始课程最近取消了其林业课程或认证。林业计划最初是在美国获得认可的,它们都位于较大的研究型大学中。在最近的几十年中,以研究/博士教育为重点的大学的林业课程有所收缩,而在其他大学和学院中几乎没有或没有研究/博士教育的课程却有所增加。如果将当前卡内基分类的毕业生人数与1935年至1960年之间的2010年进行比较,这种趋势也很明显。在许多人呼吁接受更广泛培训的林木工可以理解和应用新兴科学的时代,这些趋势引起了有关林业教育的重要问题。和管理趋势。如果这种趋势持续下去,可能会导致林业人员的培训更为狭窄,并且缺乏经过专业培训的研究人员和教师。对于以“林业科学,教育,技术和实践”的发展而自豪的专业而言,这些趋势表明了科学与实践日益分离的未来。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号