首页> 外文期刊>Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : >The Impact of Ethics Review on a Research-Led University Curriculum: Results of a Qualitative Study in Australia
【24h】

The Impact of Ethics Review on a Research-Led University Curriculum: Results of a Qualitative Study in Australia

机译:伦理审查对研究型大学课程的影响:澳大利亚定性研究的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the human sciences, a student research-centered pedagogy is constrained by institutional ethics review, yet there is little research on the impact of ethics review on research-led teaching. This article documents a range of ways that Australian universities are responding to ethics review of undergraduate human research. Forty teachers and administrators were interviewed at 14 universities using purposive sampling to document the range of ways teachers are avoiding ethics review or incorporating it into their curriculum. Some reported halting undergraduate research or evading ethics review, regarding it as meaningless bureaucracy divorced from actual ethical thinking. Those who incorporated ethics review into student research did so by collaborating with administrators. Institutions can facilitate research-led teaching by designing dedicated forms and decentralized review procedures for student research.
机译:在人文科学中,以学生研究为中心的教学法受到制度伦理学审查的约束,但是关于伦理学审查对以研究为主导的教学的影响的研究很少。本文记录了澳大利亚大学对本科生人类研究的伦理审查作出回应的各种方式。在14所大学中,有目的的抽样采访了40名教师和行政人员,以记录教师避免道德审查或将其纳入其课程的方式。一些报告称停止本科研究或回避伦理学审查,认为这是与实际伦理学思想脱节的毫无意义的官僚主义。那些将道德审查纳入学生研究的人是通过与管理人员合作来完成的。通过为学生研究设计专用表格和分散的审查程序,机构可以促进以研究为导向的教学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号