...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of endourology >Role of the laparoscopic approach to cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: does size matter?
【24h】

Role of the laparoscopic approach to cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: does size matter?

机译:腹腔镜手术在转移性肾细胞癌中细胞减少性肾切除术中的作用:大小重要吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Retrospective studies have shown laparoscopic cytoreductive nephrectomy (LCN) to be a safe procedure in selected patients. The objective of this article is to identify characteristics that may predict when a laparoscopic procedure may offer improved postoperative outcome and whether it affects the timing of postoperative systemic therapy compared with open surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort of 43 LCN cases were matched with 43 open cytoreductive nephrectomy (OCN) cases based on both pathologic size of tumor and stage. Eleven cases were laparoscopic converted to open nephrectomy. Cases excluded from the analysis were adjacent organ involvement, inferior vena cava involvement, and bulky lymphadenopathy. Data analysis of 11 variables was performed using the t test, log-rank, and Wilcoxon tests. Significance was at P = 0.05. Survival data were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimate. RESULTS: Significant differences between LCN vs OCN were estimated blood loss (mean 277 ml vs 816 ml) and length of hospitalization (3.2 days vs 5.1 days). The median size of tumor for LCN cases was 7.5 cm and for OCN, 9.5 cm. The mean size of tumor of LCN vs laparoscopic converted to open cases was 6.8 cm vs 11.2 cm, and this difference was significant. There was no significant difference in postoperative performance status, time to commencement of systemic treatment, or in survival time between both groups. This study provides further evidence that a laparoscopic approach with cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma is a safe option for tumors 10 cm and smaller. The approach (laparoscopic vs open) had no effect on postoperative complications or time to systemic therapy. CONCLUSION: Procedures with tumors larger than 10 cm were more likely to be converted to an open procedure. Tumors larger than 10 cm may be best approached via an open procedure, especially in the presence of involvement of adjacent organs or bulky lymphadenopathy.
机译:背景与目的:回顾性研究表明,腹腔镜细胞减灭性肾切除术(LCN)在某些患者中是安全的。本文的目的是确定可预测腹腔镜手术何时可以提供更好的术后结果以及与开放手术相比是否会影响术后全身治疗时机的特征。患者和方法:根据肿瘤的病理学大小和分期,将43例LCN患者与43例开放性细胞减少性肾切除术(OCN)患者配对。腹腔镜手术11例行开腹肾切除术。分析排除的病例为邻近器官受累,下腔静脉受累和大淋巴结肿大。使用t检验,对数秩检验和Wilcoxon检验对11个变量进行了数据分析。显着性为P = 0.05。使用Kaplan-Meier估计来计算生存数据。结果:LCN与OCN之间的显着差异是估计失血量(平均277 ml对816 ml)和住院时间(3.2天对5.1天)。 LCN患者的肿瘤中位大小为7.5 cm,OCN患者为9.5 cm。 LCN与腹腔镜转换为开放病例的平均肿瘤大小为6.8 cm对11.2 cm,这种差异是显着的。两组之间的术后表现状态,开始全身治疗的时间或生存时间均无显着差异。这项研究提供了进一步的证据表明,对于转移灶性肾细胞癌,腹腔镜加减细胞肾切除术是治疗10厘米及以下肿瘤的安全选择。该方法(腹腔镜还是开放式)对术后并发症或全身治疗时间没有影响。结论:肿瘤大于10 cm的手术更有可能转换为开放手术。大于10 cm的肿瘤最好通过开放式手术进行,尤其是在有邻近器官或大淋巴结肿大的情况下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号