首页> 外文期刊>Clinical therapeutics >Single-pill combination of telmisartan/Amlodipine versus amlodipine monotherapy in diabetic hypertensive patients: An 8-week randomized, parallel-group, double-blind trial
【24h】

Single-pill combination of telmisartan/Amlodipine versus amlodipine monotherapy in diabetic hypertensive patients: An 8-week randomized, parallel-group, double-blind trial

机译:替米沙坦/氨氯地平单药联合氨氯地平单药治疗糖尿病性高血压患者:一项为期8周的随机,平行,双盲试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Hypertensive patients with diabetes often require combination therapy to achieve a blood pressure (BP) goal, and evidence suggests that time to BP goal is crucial to decrease cardiovascular risk. Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate whether the single-pill combination of telmisartan and amlodipine was superior to amlodipine alone as initial antihypertensive therapy in patients with diabetes and hypertension. Methods: An 8-week, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind international trial comparing the once-daily single-pill combination of telmisartan 80 mg and amlodipine 10 mg (T/A; n = 352) with once-daily amlodipine 10 mg (A; n = 354) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and stage 1 or 2 hypertension (systolic BP [SBP] >150 mm Hg). Results: Patient demographics were similar between treatment groups, with an mean (SD) age of 60.5 (10.1) years; 51.7% were male, the mean (SD) body mass index was 32.0 (6.1) and the mean (SD) duration of hypertension was 8.8 (7.9) years. After 8 weeks (primary end point) as well as after 1, 2, and 4 weeks (key secondary end points), significantly greater decreases in the in-clinic mean seated trough cuff SBP with T/A versus A were achieved (-29.0 mm Hg vs -22.9 mm Hg at 8 weeks; P < 0.0001). After 8 weeks, 71.4% versus 53.8% of patients achieved the BP goal (<140/90 mm Hg) with T/A versus A, with mean SBPs of 131.9 and 137.9 mm Hg, respectively. Similar results were observed in the obese (metabolic syndrome) subpopulation. The more stringent goal (<130/80 mm Hg) was achieved by 36.4% and 17.9% patients in the T/A and A groups, respectively. The most common adverse events were peripheral edema, headache, and dizziness. Conclusions: In this selected population of patients with diabetes and hypertension, T/A provided prompt and greater BP decreases compared with A monotherapy, with the majority of patients achieving the BP goal (<140/90 mm Hg).
机译:背景:高血压糖尿病患者通常需要联合治疗以达到血压(BP)的目标,证据表明达到BP的时间对降低心血管风险至关重要。目的:本研究旨在探讨替米沙坦与氨氯地平的单药组合是否优于单独使用氨氯地平作为糖尿病和高血压患者的初始降压治疗方法。方法:一项为期8周的随机,平行,双盲国际试验,比较了每天一次的替米沙坦80 mg和氨氯地平10 mg(T / A; n = 352)与每天一次的氨氯地平10的单次药组合2型糖尿病和1或2期高血压(收缩压[SBP]> 150 mm Hg)的患者中,毫克(A; n = 354)。结果:治疗组之间的患者特征相似,平均(SD)年龄为60.5(10.1)岁。男性为51.7%,平均(SD)体重指数为32.0(6.1),平均(SD)高血压持续时间为8.8(7.9)年。在第8周(主要终点)以及第1、2和4周(关键的次要终点)之后,与T / A相比,A / A的临床平均就座式袖套SBP的下降明显更大(-29.0毫米汞柱与82.9周的-22.9毫米汞柱; P <0.0001)。 8周后,T / A相对于A的患者达到BP目标(<140/90 mm Hg)的比例分别为71.4%和53.8%,平均SBP分别为131.9和137.9 mm Hg。在肥胖(代谢综合征)亚群中观察到相似的结果。 T / A组和A组分别达到36.4%和17.9%的患者达到了更严格的目标(<130/80 mm Hg)。最常见的不良事件是周围水肿,头痛和头晕。结论:在这一特定的糖尿病和高血压患者人群中,与A单一疗法相比,T / A提供了迅速且更大的BP降低,大多数患者达到了BP目标(<140/90 mm Hg)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号